• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Safe as Houses?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Safe as Houses?"

Collapse

  • wim121
    replied
    Originally posted by Kanye View Post
    Or you could take the opposite and more sensible view of what goes up what must come down.



    We had a decade long boom and we have a loooong way to go to revert to anything like mean.

    Of course there is massive demand for housing, but the prices they go for are almost entirely based on what the banks will be lend.

    Hell will freeze over before we go back to the levels of bank lending seen during the boom.

    Outlook for property is very bleak indeed IMO.
    The same thing was said after people jumped out of skyscrapers in the 1930's, "never again will we let the stock market control us or lending and debts spiral out of control", but the boom bust cycle has repeated itself at a very predictable interval, on average every three decades.

    For someone looking to beat inflation, bricks and mortar is best. Most people take on a house for 20-40 years at least as they make mortgage payments on it. Comparing house prices over the past century, isnt realistic as 50-100 years ago, land was readily available and centralised housing around cities wasnt as bigger factor as it is nowadays.

    Conversely, lets look at the ratio of house prices to rentals. Here we can see in Britain, over the past thirty years, there are regular peaks and dips, related to market lows and highs:


    We havent escaped the boom bust cycle this past century and one could debate, doing so would harm our global wealth permantely.

    Leave a comment:


  • conned tractor
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    WHS

    The value of property should now be analysed around affordability of rent. Think of it as a bricks n mortar dividend.

    A report by Shelter has done an analysis of affordability of the rental market by region

    Private Rent Watch Report 1 - Analysis of local rent levels and affordability - Shelter England

    Which is based of the VOA statistics for private rents.

    Privatel Rental Market Statistics - Statistical Release - 29 September 2011 - Valuation Office Agency

    A little bit of further analysis, which I'm going to try and do later is rental yield to average property price by region. (Unless someone can find it already).
    So, what's affordable, I'm sure I read somewhere that peeps are spending around 50% of their income on a roof over there head. Although I can't find out the article now.

    Don't forget the skew in the floor on rental prices introduced by DHS rental allowances - if allowances were to be reduced then the floor introduced by this would also move. I don't think this has any basis of affordability.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by TiroFijo View Post
    It's bricks n mortar innit! Pension sorted.
    WHS

    The value of property should now be analysed around affordability of rent. Think of it as a bricks n mortar dividend.

    A report by Shelter has done an analysis of affordability of the rental market by region

    Private Rent Watch Report 1 - Analysis of local rent levels and affordability - Shelter England

    Which is based of the VOA statistics for private rents.

    Privatel Rental Market Statistics - Statistical Release - 29 September 2011 - Valuation Office Agency

    A little bit of further analysis, which I'm going to try and do later is rental yield to average property price by region. (Unless someone can find it already).

    Leave a comment:


  • TiroFijo
    replied
    It's bricks n mortar innit! Pension sorted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kanye
    replied
    Originally posted by wim121 View Post
    What goes down must come up.
    Or you could take the opposite and more sensible view of what goes up what must come down.



    We had a decade long boom and we have a loooong way to go to revert to anything like mean.

    Of course there is massive demand for housing, but the prices they go for are almost entirely based on what the banks will be lend.

    Hell will freeze over before we go back to the levels of bank lending seen during the boom.

    Outlook for property is very bleak indeed IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • wim121
    replied
    What goes down must come up.

    The simple fact, is we are in a bust. The next boom time in the boom and bust cycle, houses will be even more expensive. Property is the only real way long term, to beat inflation and even make a mass profit.

    With over 20 immigrants settling in the UK every minute and the birth rate, continuing to exceed the death rate, even as the baby boomers die off over the next couple of decades, the UK will become even more crowded and property as well as land, even more valuable.


    Houses are very safe, so long as you can afford them and keep your money in them for the long haul if required.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    This is good news. There seem to be a lot less property / diy shows on tv these days and a lot more escapist nonsense. That's what i like to see.

    Leave a comment:


  • Freamon
    replied
    A bigger problem is the 11% drop in transaction volumes over the last 12 months.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Hartlepool = 18% drop, average house price = £79K.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    started a topic Safe as Houses?

    Safe as Houses?

    2.6% drop over all UK areas for the year, which isn't too bad considering the state of the economy, but 4% drop in the Midlands and 8% drop in the north east. But, factor in that fiat money paid to house sellers is depreciating even more rapidly, and that's quite a drop.

    http://www1.landregistry.gov.uk/uplo...11_sb5ar16.pdf

    Safe as houses maybe, but not if your house (or Brummy flat) is in the UK.

Working...
X