• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Umemployment at a 17 year high"

Collapse

  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    I have just recruited 5 Romanians
    I hope you've managed to get them some council accomodation.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    Come on Dodgy, you are the the face of private sector employment.

    Get your finger out!!
    I have just recruited 5 Romanians

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Quite, they should be borrowing more money and employing more people to do nothing jobs in the public sector. having indulged ourselves with our guilt trips in patronising socialism we are now faced with the Bill.
    Come on Dodgy, you are the the face of private sector employment.

    Get your finger out!!

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Quite, they should be borrowing more money and employing more people to do nothing jobs in the public sector. The legacy of socialism.
    Now come on DA. NL did a lot more than that in countering youth unemployment.
    They lowered the academic bar sufficiently, for countless thousands of youngsters that would otherwise have joined this dole queue, to be able to get into Uni and run up prodigious levels of debt striving to attain often pointless Degrees.
    Many of them don't get to join the dole queue until it dawns on them that these qualifications are largely worthless.
    It had to be "fair" you see?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Good to see this government equalling that nice Mr Major's achievement.
    Quite, they should be borrowing more money and employing more people to do nothing jobs in the public sector. having indulged ourselves with our guilt trips in patronising socialism we are now faced with the Bill.
    Last edited by DodgyAgent; 13 October 2011, 07:42.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    So unemployment for 16-24years old is now half according to the report. So if youngsters aren't getting the skills at 16-24 how does that bode for the next 5/10 years.

    For P/T staff I used to hire over 60's because they were reliable and for Saturday staff 16/17 because they were cheap. As soon as they got older the minimum wage was too high for P/T w/e staff.

    Tickingt timebomb here.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Yep, it's all done in the name of keeping house prices high.
    Which has a knock on effect on rental prices also being high. Helped by the housing benefits that prop up the baseline, as it's inevitable private landlords will charge at least the minimum housing benefit rate.

    BBC News - Private rents in England unaffordable, says Shelter

    Private rents are now unaffordable in 55% of local authorities in England, the housing charity Shelter has said.

    Just 12% of areas were affordable, it added.
    Where's the other 33%?

    So, you want to know why the economy is tanking, causing all these job losses?

    No need to look further than cheap credit (many are maxed out on credit card and mortgage debt), high accommodation prices, high energy/food/petrol prices, and static wages. Resulting in less money to spend on everything else.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
    Is that figure using the Labour count or the new Tory count? The Tories changed the counting mechanism to show a lot more people that Labour had not been counting so the figures are bound to be higher. Easy headline for the left wing press.
    That almost makes up for the dozen or so times they changed the counting mechanism when they were last in power themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
    Is that figure using the Labour count or the new Tory count? The Tories changed the counting mechanism to show a lot more people that Labour had not been counting so the figures are bound to be higher. Easy headline for the left wing press.
    Yeah unemployment hasn't gone up, what are people complaining about?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arturo Bassick
    replied
    Is that figure using the Labour count or the new Tory count? The Tories changed the counting mechanism to show a lot more people that Labour had not been counting so the figures are bound to be higher. Easy headline for the left wing press.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    As for Miliband's attempted attack, that slight lisp and Aardman look don't do him any favours.


    Well spotted GJ.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    This "gotta keep on track to maintain AAA rating" mantra is getting a bit tired now as the projected growth just isn't happening, how high will unemployment go before Cameron takes his fingers out of his ears and stops chanting "la la la not listening"?

    As for Miliband's attempted attack, that slight lisp and Aardman look don't do him any favours.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    We have to cut jobs to keep our AAA rating, which in turn means cheap borrowing and so high house prices and therefore more profit for BTL owners.

    So it's worth it in the end.
    Yep, it's all done in the name of keeping house prices high.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    We have to cut jobs to keep our AAA rating, which in turn means cheap borrowing and so high house prices and therefore more profit for BTL owners.

    So it's worth it in the end.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    started a topic Umemployment at a 17 year high

    Umemployment at a 17 year high

    Good to see this government equalling that nice Mr Major's achievement.

Working...
X