Yeah will now get the owner in to trouble so I doubt since June anyone can drive a car that isn't already insured
Stay insured: new penalties for vehicles without motor insurance : Directgov - Motoring
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Wasting contractors time....how do I prosecute?"
Collapse
-
All edge cases - what's more important is that insurance companies trying their best to stitch people up so small print in terms and conditions might well now require that 3rd party car to have valid insurance.Originally posted by doodab View PostYes, so lets say someone taxes the car, then sells the car (for that is what happened) and cancels their insurance, so it's no longer insured by them but it is taxed. Or perhaps you buy a car with six months tax on it from a dealer. Or perhaps the tax and insurance renewal are on different days and the insurance expires a few days after it's taxed for another year. All of these could give rise to a car with valid tax but no insurance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Paddy View PostStay insured: new penalties for vehicles without motor insurance : Directgov - Motoring
You must insure the vehicle. It's not good enough to have insurance to drive.If you are not the registered keeper then as long as you have insurance to drive the vehicle you are not committing an offence.If you're the registered keeper of a vehicle, it must be insured at all times.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, so lets say someone taxes the car, then sells the car (for that is what happened) and cancels their insurance, so it's no longer insured by them but it is taxed. Or perhaps you buy a car with six months tax on it from a dealer. Or perhaps the tax and insurance renewal are on different days and the insurance expires a few days after it's taxed for another year. All of these could give rise to a car with valid tax but no insurance.Originally posted by AtW View PostYou can't tax it without having insurance for that car + MOT (if required).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostNot true. I checked this with my former insurer (privilege) when I used to have a car, and they told me that I was covered to drive a car the owner didn't have insured yet. I was picking up a car someone else had just bought.
The DVLA say
No mention that the vehicle itself must be insured, as long as you have valid insurance you aren't driving without insurance.
Best bet is to check with your insurance company and see what they say.
Stay insured: new penalties for vehicles without motor insurance : Directgov - Motoring
You must insure the vehicle. It's not good enough to have insurance to drive.
If you're the registered keeper of a vehicle, it must be insured at all times.
The exceptions are:
if you have made a SORN for the vehicle
if your vehicle has been kept off-road since before SORN came into force on 31 January 1998 – unless it was brought back into use
if your vehicle is recorded as stolen, passed or sold to the motor trade or between registered keepers
if your vehicle is recorded scrapped or permanently exported by the Driver and Vehicle Licensing (DVLA)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostNot true. I checked this with my former insurer (privilege) when I used to have a car, and they told me that I was covered to drive a car the owner didn't have insured yet. I was picking up a car someone else had just bought.
The DVLA say
No mention that the vehicle itself must be insured, as long as you have valid insurance you aren't driving without insurance.
Best bet is to check with your insurance company and see what they say.
You are both sort of right (or at least were). It depended on the policy and caveats, at the most you will have third party cover, and many insist the car is insured. The insurance industry have been a bit naughty recently with respect to this cover. Comprehensive used to automatically give you third party cover, now many don't, while some TPFT policies do and now it's confused by continuous insurance laws.
BTW if he isn't covered and he didn't get fixed penalty he will get fined more.Last edited by Bagpuss; 11 October 2011, 21:12.
Leave a comment:
-
I'll post it up in the meets section then - see the huge turnout we get.Originally posted by AtW View PostCan do - this time we make Spartacus pay for the beers
Leave a comment:
-
AFAIK you won't get tax disk unless vehicle is insured explicitly.Originally posted by doodab View PostNot true. I checked this with my former insurer (privilege) when I used to have a car, and they told me that I was covered to drive a car the owner didn't have insured yet. I was picking up a car someone else had just bought.
The DVLA say
No mention that the vehicle itself must be insured, as long as you have valid insurance you aren't driving without insurance.
Best bet is to check with your insurance company and see what they say.
Other than that there are no other flaws in this cunning plan #87.
Leave a comment:
-
Fancy another Brum meet around Christmas time? It must be two years since the last one?Originally posted by AtW View PostNo, but I had my great Italian coat stolen earlier this year - some MF in a pub did that!
Leave a comment:
-
Not true. I checked this with my former insurer (privilege) when I used to have a car, and they told me that I was covered to drive a car the owner didn't have insured yet. I was picking up a car someone else had just bought.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostYour insurance to drive other people's cars does not cover you if that car is not insured independently by its keeper.
The DVLA say
No mention that the vehicle itself must be insured, as long as you have valid insurance you aren't driving without insurance.Before taking a vehicle on the road
The vehicle must:
be registered with the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA)
have a valid vehicle tax disc
hold a current test certificate (if this is required)
You must:
have the minimum of third party insurance which covers your use of the vehicle
Best bet is to check with your insurance company and see what they say.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Today 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Yesterday 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26


Leave a comment: