Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Bank of England abandons part of QE program after traders make bonds too expensive"
They aren't afraid of anyone. That's the problem these days. Personally I would look at introducing laws forbidding some forms of secondary trading of government bonds. Minimum holding period, no naked shorting, stuff like that. Essentially keep the speculators out of the market so that it functions properly.
It is a sign of times however - traders are not afraid to bed against BoE and The Feds (FRS).
They aren't afraid of anyone. That's the problem these days. Personally I would look at introducing laws forbidding some forms of secondary trading of government bonds. Minimum holding period, no naked shorting, stuff like that. Essentially keep the speculators out of the market so that it functions properly.
What this means is that BoE thinks that yield of 8.75% on Govt AAAAAAAA quality bonds isn't good enough to tolerate inflation that will hit us until 2017
The coupon is 8.75%, the yield is substantially lower.
Unlikely - probably tried to sell stuff they don't have at spekulatively high price, if they had got the deal they would have bought same bonds on cheap.
The only loser in this is a taxpayer.
HTH
For the price to go up like that someone had to be buying.
This is excellent news! I really hope some traders got badly stung on this. :-)
Unlikely - probably tried to sell stuff they don't have at spekulatively high price, if they had got the deal they would have bought same bonds on cheap.
What this means is that BoE thinks that yield of 8.75% on Govt AAAAAAAA quality bonds isn't good enough to tolerate inflation that will hit us until 2017
I didn't realise the yield on these bonds was so much. Sounds like a good deal to me. What was it before the traders brought it down?
They must be pricing in a lot of future inflation. Does it mean coupon rather than yield?
Problem with buying corporate bonds instead of gilts is that it doesn't push down government borrowing costs. Though would certainly be good for big businesses.
I think it's a ruse by the BoE, to switch from buying gilts to directly buying corporate bonds instead. In doing so they fund large companies directly, bypassing the banks.
Leave a comment: