• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "This got me thinking..."

Collapse

  • Bunk
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    Not really. It's just that the longer the match they try to find, the longer it will take.

    As it's inevitable that given enough time any body of text can be replicated using random character selection, the whole task is pretty pointless.
    The problem is that there isn't enough time, the prof of maths in the article reckons it would take longer than the age of the universe.


    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    I wonder how much all that Amazon service usage is costing? Some people must have money to burn. Unless Amazon are donating it for the publicity.
    £12.40 a day. It mentions it in the article.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    This is different to writing an entire text by monkey chance.

    Not really. It's just that the longer the match they try to find, the longer it will take.

    As it's inevitable that given enough time any body of text can be replicated using random character selection, the whole task is pretty pointless.

    I wonder how much all that Amazon service usage is costing? Some people must have money to burn. Unless Amazon are donating it for the publicity.

    Leave a comment:


  • sal626
    replied
    this line explains the fatal flaw in that theory:

    Also in 2003, Paignton Zoo carried out a practical test by putting a keyboard connected to a PC into the cage of six crested macaques. After a month the monkeys had produced five pages of the letter "S" and had broken the keyboard.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Sounds like a load of rubbish. They might just as well have kept a record of single correct characters and saved a lot more time.

    This is different to writing an entire text by monkey chance.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    started a topic This got me thinking...

    This got me thinking...

    BBC News - Virtual monkeys write Shakespeare

    Could a few million bobs replace you lot? ...Nah it will never happen.

Working...
X