- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: And Justice for All!!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "And Justice for All!!"
Collapse
-
Bit of an arse up all round then. I think they changed the no retrial rule on NP verdicts recently or were going to.
I doubt he will get much more time than he has already served on remand anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
BBC has it that he offered PF a plea of guilty to both BOP and the Assault if they removed the religious bit and they said no.Originally posted by minestrone View PostShirley the PF could have worked out that the aggrivated might have been difficult to get with only one witnessand just put him down for an assault. I take it he will just get off with the assault now?
Scots law, I'm not sure if the assault is a different offence, if so they can just prosecute him again for that I'd imagine without trying to pin the religious bit on him.
Leave a comment:
-
Shirley the PF could have worked out that the aggrivated might have been difficult to get with only one witnessand just put him down for an assault. I take it he will just get off with the assault now?
Leave a comment:
-
That's enough about Lennon. What about the attacker?Originally posted by Incognito View PostQuite clearly an assault, but aggravated by religious prejudice? One witness said he heard 'Fenian Bastard', defendant says nope never said that, no other witnesses heard the comment, even though plenty of witnesses close to the incident. NL even said he didn't hear it.
You can see why 'Not Proven' has been returned (doesn't mean they don't think he didn't do it, just that they don't have enough evidence to say either way), still should have been done for assault though. The guy's a ******* arse.
Leave a comment:
-
Quite clearly an assault, but aggravated by religious prejudice? One witness said he heard 'Fenian Bastard', defendant says nope never said that, no other witnesses heard the comment, even though plenty of witnesses close to the incident. NL even said he didn't hear it.
You can see why 'Not Proven' has been returned (doesn't mean they don't think he didn't do it, just that they don't have enough evidence to say either way), still should have been done for assault though. The guy's a ******* arse.He asked Mr Lennon if he heard anything being said and he replied no and that the atmosphere had been noisy and he was pulled away quickly.
Leave a comment:
-
I believe that the peculiarly Scottish verdict of "not proven" does not make him innocent. AIUI it means "we know you did it, we just do not have enough evidence to convict".Originally posted by SimonMac View PostAs he has been proven innocent by a jury of his peers, on his behalf I demand an apology from the local Left Footers for slurring his good name!
Leave a comment:
-
As he has been proven innocent by a jury of his peers, on his behalf I demand an apology from the local Left Footers for slurring his good name!
Leave a comment:
-
And Justice for All!!
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLS) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? May 29 04:45
- Contractors, are you making any of the five big limited company bank account mistakes of 2026? May 28 05:51
- ‘Welcome’ increase in HMRC mileage rates for contractors using their own cars for work May 27 05:18
- King’s Speech 2026 including a welcome Late Payments Bill still leaves contractors short May 26 04:42
- Getting a mortgage when you're a contractor. The system wasn't built for you. Is that finally changing? May 22 06:11
- How deepfake AI contractors threaten umbrella company supply chains under JSL May 20 06:31
- Mileage rates review: Will the first AMAP rethink in 15 years benefit contractors? May 19 05:57
- What is a Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE), and are FDE jobs for IT contractors ripe? May 18 04:43
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25

Leave a comment: