• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "And Justice for All!!"

Collapse

  • Churchill
    replied
    Judge is a Mason, obviously.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Bit of an arse up all round then. I think they changed the no retrial rule on NP verdicts recently or were going to.

    I doubt he will get much more time than he has already served on remand anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Shirley the PF could have worked out that the aggrivated might have been difficult to get with only one witnessand just put him down for an assault. I take it he will just get off with the assault now?
    BBC has it that he offered PF a plea of guilty to both BOP and the Assault if they removed the religious bit and they said no.

    Scots law, I'm not sure if the assault is a different offence, if so they can just prosecute him again for that I'd imagine without trying to pin the religious bit on him.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Shirley the PF could have worked out that the aggrivated might have been difficult to get with only one witnessand just put him down for an assault. I take it he will just get off with the assault now?

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    Quite clearly an assault, but aggravated by religious prejudice? One witness said he heard 'Fenian Bastard', defendant says nope never said that, no other witnesses heard the comment, even though plenty of witnesses close to the incident. NL even said he didn't hear it.



    You can see why 'Not Proven' has been returned (doesn't mean they don't think he didn't do it, just that they don't have enough evidence to say either way), still should have been done for assault though. The guy's a ******* arse.
    That's enough about Lennon. What about the attacker?

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Quite clearly an assault, but aggravated by religious prejudice? One witness said he heard 'Fenian Bastard', defendant says nope never said that, no other witnesses heard the comment, even though plenty of witnesses close to the incident. NL even said he didn't hear it.

    He asked Mr Lennon if he heard anything being said and he replied no and that the atmosphere had been noisy and he was pulled away quickly.
    You can see why 'Not Proven' has been returned (doesn't mean they don't think he didn't do it, just that they don't have enough evidence to say either way), still should have been done for assault though. The guy's a ******* arse.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arturo Bassick
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    As he has been proven innocent by a jury of his peers, on his behalf I demand an apology from the local Left Footers for slurring his good name!
    I believe that the peculiarly Scottish verdict of "not proven" does not make him innocent. AIUI it means "we know you did it, we just do not have enough evidence to convict".

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    As he has been proven innocent by a jury of his peers, on his behalf I demand an apology from the local Left Footers for slurring his good name!

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Surely that was a free kick????

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    Jury's

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied


    Dear oh dear!!

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    started a topic And Justice for All!!

    And Justice for All!!

    BBC News - Fan cleared of Lennon attack after not proven verdict

    Only in Scotland!!

Working...
X