Reply to: Agents!!!

[TimberWolf]

I think that in all fairness to the girls, I could not possibly draw any meaningful comparison without trying both out simultaneously. Set up a meet TW and I will report back with my findings.........as soon as I get my breath back!

I would have enough trouble trying out both simultaneously myself, let alone setting it up for a third party.

Unless you can you supply 2 references, in which case game on!

[shaunbhoy]

Let's put it to the CUK vote:

Who does the panel think would make the best agent (despite the second one not being an agent)?
or

I think that in all fairness to the girls, I could not possibly draw any meaningful comparison without trying both out simultaneously. Set up a meet TW and I will report back with my findings.........as soon as I get my breath back!

[TimberWolf]

No, Marlies is an agent.

Let's put it to the CUK vote:

Who does the panel think would make the best agent (despite the second one not being an agent)?
or

[shaunbhoy]

It's only unfortunate if you have the mental age of a 3 year old

Not to worry sas, perhaps in future, posters could mark their offerings in such a way that this particular limitation of yours might not spoil your enjoyment.

[Arturo Bassick]

What an unfortunate name..............Tanja Kok!! Does that mean she has a penchant for the Oxo Tower?

I thought that was what "back office service" meant!

[sasguru]

What an unfortunate name..............Tanja Kok!! Does that mean she has a penchant for the Oxo Tower?

It's only unfortunate if you have the mental age of a 3 year old, you gurning moron.

[shaunbhoy]

Bottom half of the page; there must be at least one agent that you would...
Team

What an unfortunate name..............Tanja Kok!! Does that mean she has a penchant for the Oxo Tower?

[Mich the Tester]

All of whome are "backoffice", except Laura Tuininga, Marketing & Communicatie (s4@gs potential clients?) for some reason.

No, Marlies is an agent.

[TimberWolf]

Bottom half of the page; there must be at least one agent that you would...
Team

All of whome are "backoffice", except Laura Tuininga, Marketing & Communicatie (s4@gs potential clients?) for some reason.

[Mich the Tester]

They forgot our brilliant idea of turning around and saying "No".

What amuses me more is then they then phone up 2 or 3 days later trying it on again.

You're just playing hard to get.

[SueEllen]

I think it is a new brilliant idea they have had.

They forgot our brilliant idea of turning around and saying "No".

What amuses me more is then they then phone up 2 or 3 days later trying it on again.

[Mich the Tester]

Bottom half of the page; there must be at least one agent that you would...
Team

[Peoplesoft bloke]

I think it is a new brilliant idea they have had. When I was looking to go permie (list of valid excuses on request) one pimp was talking about a gig which ticked all the boxes - then he casually dropped in that it paid 10K less than he originally said - I mean WTF?

I also had an interview (with their appointed agent) for a US SaaS software house who are trying to set up an implementation group here - they told me the sal range and asked what I wanted - told 'em the max of course. Then the pimp phiones to say the max budget is actually 20k less.

I dunno if they think we're going to say "Oh fair enough" or something, but both are now on my ignore list - the first pimp even had the cheek to ring me last week.

I do know that they have wasted a shed load of my time and theirs for no gain - and the SaaS job remains unfilled because I know two other people they tried to pull the exact same stunt with and who have also turned them down - one after being given a written offer. It is a crap business model as far as I can see to spend ages on the phone, email and writing letters only to hack everyone off and not make any cash.

[Churchill]

I think you mean 'adjective'.

Possibly.

[Mich the Tester]

I think you mean 'adjective'.