People on here must be loaded

[sasguru]

How can yuo spot him? I mean he is.....

Don't try to be clever. It's not in your nature.

[ThomasSoerensen]

I think that research is flawed. There are loads of poor, nasty bastards on CUK. Just look at Incognito.

How can yuo spot him? I mean he is.....

[Mich the Tester]

I used to be quite rich but not any more. I do have more friends these days.

[sasguru]

I think that research is flawed. There are loads of poor, nasty bastards on CUK. Just look at Incognito.

[Mich the Tester]

Group hug, everyone.

BOG OFF!

[sasguru]

Well I'm rich AND incredibly nice.

Group hug, everyone.

[AtW]

KUATB

Feckin' idiot

My link is different you insensitive cretin.

[Mich the Tester]

KUATB

Feckin' idiot

Yes, if I was a highly paid arsehole I'd have pointed that out, but it'a bit like reviving my own threads.

[Sysman]

Unfortunately for my bank account those people who have met me in real life seem to consider me a pleasant individual.

What works in the US doesn't necessarily work elsewhere.

I prefer to have friends rather than live a Howard Hughes lifestyle.

[Spacecadet]

Workplace study finds it doesn’t pay to be nice

Nice guys do not necessarily finish last but will finish a distant second in the pay stakes, a US-based study into earnings and agreeableness has found.

Unveiling their findings, researchers at New York’s Cornell University showed that agreeable workers take home considerably less than their harder-nosed colleagues.

Although so-called ‘nice gals’ also receive thinner pay packets, the earnings gap between ‘agreeable’ and ‘disagreeable’ in men emerged as much more marked.

Or as delegates at the Academy of Management were told, on being presented with the findings this week “disagreeable guys simply leave agreeable ones in the dust.”

So whereas agreeable women are £1,115 worse off than their more challenging peers each year, men are down approximately £6,000 over the same period, the study found.

Based on data taken over 20 years in multiple surveys, the findings show ‘agreeable’ ‘warm’ ‘friendly’ or even ‘helpful’ types earn “significantly less,” particularly if they are male.

Source: Workplace study finds it doesn

I feel sorry for cojak though

KUATB

Feckin' idiot

[ThomasSoerensen]

Workplace study finds it doesn’t pay to be nice

Nice guys do not necessarily finish last but will finish a distant second in the pay stakes, a US-based study into earnings and agreeableness has found.

Unveiling their findings, researchers at New York’s Cornell University showed that agreeable workers take home considerably less than their harder-nosed colleagues.

Although so-called ‘nice gals’ also receive thinner pay packets, the earnings gap between ‘agreeable’ and ‘disagreeable’ in men emerged as much more marked.

Or as delegates at the Academy of Management were told, on being presented with the findings this week “disagreeable guys simply leave agreeable ones in the dust.”

So whereas agreeable women are £1,115 worse off than their more challenging peers each year, men are down approximately £6,000 over the same period, the study found.

Based on data taken over 20 years in multiple surveys, the findings show ‘agreeable’ ‘warm’ ‘friendly’ or even ‘helpful’ types earn “significantly less,” particularly if they are male.

Source: Workplace study finds it doesn

I feel sorry for cojak though

FOAD

[Mich the Tester]

**** off, c*cksocket.













My invoice is in the post

You, you! You evil man!

I'm not very good at this am I?

[TestMangler]

Workplace study finds it doesn’t pay to be nice

Nice guys do not necessarily finish last but will finish a distant second in the pay stakes, a US-based study into earnings and agreeableness has found.

Unveiling their findings, researchers at New York’s Cornell University showed that agreeable workers take home considerably less than their harder-nosed colleagues.

Although so-called ‘nice gals’ also receive thinner pay packets, the earnings gap between ‘agreeable’ and ‘disagreeable’ in men emerged as much more marked.

Or as delegates at the Academy of Management were told, on being presented with the findings this week “disagreeable guys simply leave agreeable ones in the dust.”

So whereas agreeable women are £1,115 worse off than their more challenging peers each year, men are down approximately £6,000 over the same period, the study found.

Based on data taken over 20 years in multiple surveys, the findings show ‘agreeable’ ‘warm’ ‘friendly’ or even ‘helpful’ types earn “significantly less,” particularly if they are male.

Source: Workplace study finds it doesn

I feel sorry for cojak though

**** off, c*cksocket.




















My invoice is in the post

[Mich the Tester]

Unfortunately for my bank account those people who have met me in real life seem to consider me a pleasant individual.

[AtW]

Workplace study finds it doesn’t pay to be nice

Nice guys do not necessarily finish last but will finish a distant second in the pay stakes, a US-based study into earnings and agreeableness has found.

Unveiling their findings, researchers at New York’s Cornell University showed that agreeable workers take home considerably less than their harder-nosed colleagues.

Although so-called ‘nice gals’ also receive thinner pay packets, the earnings gap between ‘agreeable’ and ‘disagreeable’ in men emerged as much more marked.

Or as delegates at the Academy of Management were told, on being presented with the findings this week “disagreeable guys simply leave agreeable ones in the dust.”

So whereas agreeable women are £1,115 worse off than their more challenging peers each year, men are down approximately £6,000 over the same period, the study found.

Based on data taken over 20 years in multiple surveys, the findings show ‘agreeable’ ‘warm’ ‘friendly’ or even ‘helpful’ types earn “significantly less,” particularly if they are male.

Source: Workplace study finds it doesn

I feel sorry for cojak though