• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "defence secretary : international laws are a hindrance to uk troops"

Collapse

  • Joe Black
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    Problem of guerillas shooting in the back and blowing IEDs on the side of the road can be easily and cheaply solved by not invading countries.
    No, the problem can be solved by the following, often quoted, solution:

    "I say we take off, and nuke the site from orbit. Its the only way to be sure."

    Instead of worrying about places like Iraq/Iran, as the imam said, Israel - sorry I meant Iran - [should] be wiped off the map.

    Joe in "if it's good enough for Ahmadinejad it's good enough for me" mode.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dundeegeorge
    replied
    Err, no, that was John and Yoko, shirley

    Originally posted by Churchill
    I seem to recall Georgie boy saying the war was over...
    So just how old did I say I was?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    I seem to recall Georgie boy saying the war was over...

    Leave a comment:


  • Not So Wise
    replied
    Can you blame them? I would love the power to do whatever i like

    Leave a comment:


  • stackpole
    replied
    This is the same sort of New Labour thinking as:

    * Trying to remove the power of the upper house to veto their legislation

    * Lying to get parliamentary support for invading another country

    * Implementing ID cards and woolly terrorism laws

    They simply want the power to do whatever they like.

    Leave a comment:


  • eternalnomad
    replied
    I especially like this quote from the article:-

    "We are finding an enemy which obeys no rules whatsoever", he said, referring to what he called "barbaric terrorism".


    Was this a quote by....

    (a) John Reid our esteemed defence secretary

    or

    (b) a citizen of the illegally invaded sovereign country of Iraq

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Problem of guerillas shooting in the back and blowing IEDs on the side of the road can be easily and cheaply solved by not invading countries.

    The real funny thing is that if he thinks that by treating guerillas badly would somehow make the difference - why would people who are ready to blow themselves up in a carbomb care if he would apply XRay techniques to them like simulated drawning (sp?)?

    Also, AFAIK, countries already allowed to make pre-emptive strikes, but for this there should be clear and present danger, say enemy's army massing on its borders.... that would have made it legal for Iraq to attack US army unloading in Kuweit and elsewehere, strange laws eh?
    Last edited by AtW; 4 April 2006, 08:23.

    Leave a comment:


  • defence secretary : international laws are a hindrance to uk troops

    who's the terrorist ?
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/...746322,00.html
Working...
X