- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "I'm going to start wearing my pants inside out"
Collapse
-
Could do, but it's an inefficient way of turning pants inside out, a 1 in 10 chance at best.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostYou could just wash them.
Leave a comment:
-
You could just wash them.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostNo, not like superman, turned inside out.
All the worst bits of pants are on the inside, while the better workmanship is lavished* on the outside. To wit, the stitching on the waist, which can itch, the ridge of material that joins the pants together and makes the fly and other edges, and the label. All on the inside and a source of irritation. This innovative solution to an everyday problem may turn out to be pants though, which apparently means bad.
* or at least the effort put into the comfort of pants that cost £2 for 3
Leave a comment:
-
I'm going to start wearing my pants inside out
No, not like superman, turned inside out.
All the worst bits of pants are on the inside, while the better workmanship is lavished* on the outside. To wit, the stitching on the waist, which can itch, the ridge of material that joins the pants together and makes the fly and other edges, and the label. All on the inside and a source of irritation. This innovative solution to an everyday problem may turn out to be pants though, which apparently means bad.
* or at least the effort put into the comfort of pants that cost £2 for 3Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18

Leave a comment: