• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Helicopter with wings promises to change aviation world"

Collapse

  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Surely STOL is cheaper and safer.
    Not so practical in some places though. Oil rigs, snowfields and tower office blocks spring to mind

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Surely STOL is cheaper and safer.
    Wow, impressive control there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Surely STOL is cheaper and safer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    I've just applied for a patent, before anyone else thinks of it, to change the rotors on the wings to jet engines.
    They're not as efficient as turboprops at lower speeds and altitudes.

    But hey, Jet A1 is cheap enough...

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    I've just applied for a patent, before anyone else thinks of it, to change the rotors on the wings to jet engines.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    The G-Lynx reached 249mph, I've got it on a poster.
    I thought that was more like it.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by pacharan View Post
    Isn't that what used to be called an auto-gyro? They had those back in the 30s.
    No, an autogyro doesn't power the rotor blades so you need forward motion to get lift.

    Leave a comment:


  • pacharan
    replied
    Isn't that what used to be called an auto-gyro? They had those back in the 30s.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by fragglerock View Post
    Yep 199.92mph for the lynx 267mph for the weird thing.
    The G-Lynx reached 249mph, I've got it on a poster.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    A Helicopter with wings? Not quite Cricket!!

    Harrumph!!

    Leave a comment:


  • fragglerock
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Is it faster than the Lynx?
    Yep 199.92mph for the lynx 267mph for the weird thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Is it faster than the Lynx?

    Leave a comment:


  • MrRobin
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    Isn't the biggest issue with high speed helicopters the airspeed of the forwards moving rotor tip and the pressure wave as it approaches transonic? Stopping the rotors from falling to bits will need some fairly funky materials especially if some pilot puts it into a dive.
    Correct, but with these types of heli design presumably the rotors are slowed down or even stopped when the speed of the aircraft means enough lift comes from the wings alone.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by wobbegong View Post
    It's an old idea, we Brits had one back in the 1950's.

    I've got a load of original promo docs from my days at Westland including one for the Rotodyne, things were so much more exciting when cost and efficiency wasn't so important.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    There's also this type of approach to the problem :- Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    There have been variations on this theme kicking about for a while.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X