- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Madeleine Mccann book
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Madeleine Mccann book"
Collapse
-
While the comment may sound brutal to the lay person she is speaking from a GP's viewpoint. Reconstructive surgery is rare but horribly something too common and people in her area of work have to deal with every so often.
-
The problem is most parents wouldn't have left their kids alone over the course of the holiday in such a way and then appeared to be so uncooperative in the aftermath. So right from the start we have a group of people (not just the McCanns) who are behaving odd to most parents/people. So many subsequent actions also seem odd, possibly including the one you mention, if they are more involved in the disappearance than they admit.Originally posted by k2p2 View PostIf I'd done in my kid and got away with it, I think I would keep my head down and keep out the limelight as much as possible. I certainly wouldn't be encouraging people to keep thinking about it.
Maybe it's this odd behaviour base line (possibly due to them being doctors so wired/trained to think/behave differently) that has allowed most of the public to fall into two very distinct camps or drift somewhere between. Those that believe the abduction theory and offer sympathy to the McCanns at varying degrees, to those that think they are involved in a cover up of the death of Madeleine.
It appears this thread is going the same way as many threads on many forums (there's one on a motoring forum I frequent that has grown to around 250 pages in the course of 8 months
) with people speculating and falling somewhere between those two camps I mention. Maybe we should move on to more typical debates such as what to have for lunch and leave the McCann discussion to more appropriate forums before the McCann legal team descend on CUK.
Leave a comment:
-
Whereas the truly posh get a nanny in when they are young and pack them off for months when they are older...Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostMuch easier to be judgemental on middle class parents. We expect that type of behaviour from working class don't we?
Leave a comment:
-
Much easier to be judgemental on middle class parents. We expect that type of behaviour from working class don't we?Originally posted by moorfield View PostThey wanted both kids, and their pre-kids social life.
Sensible parents like you accept their priorities change and move on, selfish parents don't.
Understandable, don't we all, they were on holiday, I thought when the story first broke.
Then I read they'd been doing that every night for the week, and she'd had several rounds of IVF. No sympathy after that.
Leave a comment:
-
They wanted both kids, and their pre-kids social life.Originally posted by stek View Post
When I 'became' a single father in 2003, left with five children aged 10 down to 2 I never left any one of them on their own,
I still don't understand why these people did this.
Sensible parents like you accept their priorities change and move on, selfish parents don't.
Understandable, don't we all, they were on holiday, I thought when the story first broke.
Then I read they'd been doing that every night for the week, and she'd had several rounds of IVF. No sympathy after that.Last edited by moorfield; 17 June 2011, 20:50.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeh. But he works down the road in my chip shop.Originally posted by stek View PostAs there have of Elvis....
Leave a comment:
-
If I'd done in my kid and got away with it, I think I would keep my head down and keep out the limelight as much as possible. I certainly wouldn't be encouraging people to keep thinking about it.Originally posted by PAH View PostYes probably, though there are whole internet sites and forums built around the inconsistencies and curious facts (such as the shutters not having been jemmied or anyone having disturbed the lichen on the window sill, leading the McCanns to say the open window must have been a red herring from the abductor
) highlighted in the released official portugese files.
It's very intriguing seeing all the evidence and statements, which upon analysis makes it hard to then still believe the abduction theory as presented, yet the McCanns are still very much behaving as if that is the truth. Maybe it is maybe it isn't. A puzzle it appears only a select few will ever really know the answer to.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes probably, though there are whole internet sites and forums built around the inconsistencies and curious facts (such as the shutters not having been jemmied or anyone having disturbed the lichen on the window sill, leading the McCanns to say the open window must have been a red herring from the abductorOriginally posted by Churchill View PostLoads of conspiracy theorists looking for inconsistencies?
) highlighted in the released official portugese files.
It's very intriguing seeing all the evidence and statements, which upon analysis makes it hard to then still believe the abduction theory as presented, yet the McCanns are still very much behaving as if that is the truth. Maybe it is maybe it isn't. A puzzle it appears only a select few will ever really know the answer to.
Leave a comment:
-
WMFSOriginally posted by MarillionFan View PostYou are incorrect about the cold trail.
There have been 100s of possible sightings. The Portuguese closed the case and as it's not a UK case the UK police have also not followed anything up. Everytime you see one of those sensationalist 'Madeline spotted' reports in the paper it's the Mccanns who follow it up, not the
police.
That's why they petitioned Cameron to review the case. The UK police are now looking at the evidence from Portugal to see what mistakes were made and make recommendations. But they are not following leads up as Mr Fitz so got on his high horse last month(I'd love to know the reply he got from the Prime Ministers office). So the Mccanns need money to follow the leads and keep the pressure on.
The trail may have gone cold, but drowning men clutch at straws and all that. Until it has been unequivocally proven that she is dead they will continue to look. Doing that effectively takes cash,and the more of it you have the more searching you can do. Seems to me that is justification enough for the book.
Leave a comment:
-
You are incorrect about the cold trail.
There have been 100s of possible sightings. The Portuguese closed the case and as it's not a UK case the UK police have also not followed anything up. Everytime you see one of those sensationalist 'Madeline spotted' reports in the paper it's the Mccanns who follow it up, not the
police.
That's why they petitioned Cameron to review the case. The UK police are now looking at the evidence from Portugal to see what mistakes were made and make recommendations. But they are not following leads up as Mr Fitz so got on his high horse last month(I'd love to know the reply he got from the Prime Ministers office). So the Mccanns need money to follow the leads and keep the pressure on.
Leave a comment:
-
It's odd cos the trail is stone dead, finding anything now is extremely unlikely.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostWhy is it odd?
The Madeline fund has run out of money. She wrote the book to generate more cash so they could continue to pay private investigators to follow up leads that no-one else is doing.
Not odd at all.
When I 'became' a single father in 2003, left with five children aged 10 down to 2 I never left any one of them on their own, sheer fear gripped me at the thought of it, even now my youngest is 10 and with four older siblings to cope with, common-sense personified I won't leave her on her own.
I still don't understand why these people did this. Now I can feel it's their/her guilt, but writing a book is shocking to me, a bit like Ryan Giggs writing about his super-injuction horror, it's not right.
Something still very fishy about this whole thing....
Leave a comment:
-
Loads of conspiracy theorists looking for inconsistencies?Originally posted by PAH View PostThe book is mostly a publication of Kate's diary she has been keeping since the event, so not much effort needed to get the book together. Besides the find madeleine fund was close to running dry so it helps keep the search going.
I'm not sure who is really interested in purchasing it though as 99% of the 'story' has been well publicised since the event. Maybe those that find it fascinating to read about the lives of Jordan and all those other people in the public eye that otherwise have little to interest people will enjoy reading about how Kate couldn't have marital relations with Gerry.
Leave a comment:
-
Why is it odd?Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostSimple motivation for that, books that sell well make a lot of cash.
I agree writing a book or even helping a book to be written isn't something I'd do as her parent, it's very odd behaviour.
The Madeline fund has run out of money. She wrote the book to generate more cash so they could continue to pay private investigators to follow up leads that no-one else is doing.
Not odd at all.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rsingh View PostApologies for the way I reacted to your initial comment on the thread. I had thought that you were trolling and perpetuating Internet myth. I was wrong.
No need to apologise. At one point I was worried I had been suckered (and almost banned for) into perpetuating an internet myth!
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Today 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11

Leave a comment: