• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The official The Official England Test Cricket 2011 Thread"

Collapse

  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Maginty View Post
    For me the best days of cricket were the 1980's. Beefy and Lamby were fantastic! The game had so much spirit back then.
    I agree to some extent but I think it's an age thing. Plus Brian Johnson.

    Over the past ten years though England have played better and better cricket (except when Flintoff was captain) and snatched results we could only dream about during last century (except for the odd Botham surprise.)

    The worst days were the 1990s, when England were limited in talent, leadership and coaching.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Maginty View Post
    For me the best days of cricket were the 1980's. Beefy and Lamby were fantastic! The game had so much spirit back then.
    Ever listened to the 12th man? If not, you should

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Maginty
    replied
    ..
    Last edited by Jeff Maginty; 11 June 2022, 08:19.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    I think my previous post finished them off.

    Things seem to work differently when England are batting. I stopped listening just before that last over when Strauss was out. That means that now I've got to listen all day.

    Leave a comment:


  • PRC1964
    replied
    Yes, Jayawardene II out. OK, now get the last man out and don't lose a wicket tonight.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    tulip, dropped!

    OK, here's another post. Sri Lanka have only ever had a couple of great bowlers and they're both gone now, so 400 might not be enough (time permitting)

    Who would we have as our own Geoffrey Boycott?

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    tulip, dropped!

    OK, here's another post. Sri Lanka have only ever had a couple of great bowlers and they're both gone now, so 400 might not be enough (time permitting)

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by PRC1964 View Post
    And as you posted, they lost a wicket.

    Keep posting.
    Good God, so they did.

    Right, here's another post then. That was Broad's 100th wicket in tests. It only cost him 105 runs.

    (DS now watches cricinfo for wicket number 8 to fall)

    Leave a comment:


  • PRC1964
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    ...and now they're at it again.
    And as you posted, they lost a wicket.

    Keep posting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    I have vague memories of Sri Lanka's first test in England in about 1984. They batted, and batted, and batted, and have done it ever since...
    ...and now they're at it again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
    True but no one can bat forever. should beat SL. India a harder proposition for sure
    True, and England are a different prospect to the pie chuckers circa 1984 to 2004.

    I have vague memories of Sri Lanka's first test in England in about 1984. They batted, and batted, and batted, and have done it ever since.

    England seem to be on the way in this test though, they've got the three stars out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    One match at a time. Sri Lanka have got weaker bowling than they've had for many years, but they can still bat.
    True but no one can bat forever. should beat SL. India a harder proposition for sure

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    One match at a time. Sri Lanka have got weaker bowling than they've had for many years, but they can still bat.

    Leave a comment:


  • The official The Official England Test Cricket 2011 Thread

    Test starts tomorrow. Come on. Have tickets for one of the one-dayers, but the tests are the real deal. Could make no. 1 this year IF we beat India too.

    <rubs hands together>

    Love it.

    Predicted player of the series: Alistair Cook (again). He has the potential to get to no.1 himself too if he can build on the ashes.

    Please no posts from antagonistic scots
Working...
X