• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "This is what the TV licence tax SHOULD be used for!"

Collapse

  • Denny
    replied
    Originally posted by Mailman
    Good rant there Denny.

    What really gets me about this country is that most of the civilised world that also had tv taxes have abolished them.

    I saw last week the beeb was bleating about being political pawn...but hey...you accept the Queens shillings you better be prepared to do as she tells you. IF the beeb wants to do as it pleases then lets scrap the tv tax and let them fight it out in a real commercial world!

    Second...when watching the news all I really want is the news! Not emotional crap added by a news reporter only interested in some rubbish end of year media award!

    Mailman
    Good point, MM.

    The scariest thing for me these days, is that every aspect of a person's life seems to be fair game for entertainment and commericial gain. I've heard the expression 'all the world's a stage' but I can't say I like it much.

    No one has any dignity anymore, it seems to me. Everyone wear's their feelings and experiences on their shirtsleeves and there seems to be no limit to the depths some people will plunder in order to get ahead socially or professionally or to gain celebrity status. It seems that unless you're a celebrity figure you're virtually worthless. Funny that considering.....

    This problem kicked off in the 80s when the era of psychobabble, mainly imported from America, started to catch on as mainstream reading material for the masses. Soon everyone was buying '10 ways to increase your wealth, happiness and relationships' by Dr Anne Tovie-Smith (I made that up) or 'How to increase your confidence and build wealth' and so on. Everyone went ona a self-training mission to counter criticism, no matter how justified, and soon everyone caught on that a well-deflected remark was better currency than listening to justified criticism in the first place. Now critics are known as ranters and moaners not people who are expressing what is wrong with the world. Apparently, it is the critic who has the problem not the criticised. Of course, we live in perfect world.....

    Now everyone is told they are entitled to feel good about themselves, whether they deserve to or not, and self esteem is prized above all other characteristics that should really give rise to it: such as bravery, talent, hard work, personal courage, high standards of behaviour and so on. Apparently, nowadays, irrespective of how lazy, inept and stupid a person is, no-one should ever feel bad about themselves and to see that feeling bad is a barometer for improving behaviour and attitude and so on. So instead of becoming harder working, cleverer and so on they're encouraged to go 'search their inner child' by attending some psychobabble bootcamp, stick some audio tape on or read some other mindless import from America in order to relieve themselves of the the bad feelings they probably deserve to have in the first place. It's all about ridding the symptoms not tackling the causes and it's been an effective way for the second rate to get ahead without doing very much to deserve it. Now first rate people are trailing behind unless they are very lucky indeed because the reigns of power have been snatched from under them.

    No wonder materialistic kids have everything but are still unhappy and 10 year olds are scouring shopping centres for babies and then murdering them.

    Yes, I'm in one of my 'put the world to rights' moods today. :
    Last edited by Denny; 19 March 2006, 18:47.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by Denny
    I agree with Jabberwocky, if he's not pulling a stunt to get a reaction.

    The standard of TV programme making these days is abysmal.
    Good rant there Denny.

    What really gets me about this country is that most of the civilised world that also had tv taxes have abolished them.

    I saw last week the beeb was bleating about being political pawn...but hey...you accept the Queens shillings you better be prepared to do as she tells you. IF the beeb wants to do as it pleases then lets scrap the tv tax and let them fight it out in a real commercial world!

    Second...when watching the news all I really want is the news! Not emotional crap added by a news reporter only interested in some rubbish end of year media award!

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    >At least we now have mostly UK stuff.

    Give me repeats of Frasier & Seinfeld any day.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fungus
    replied
    When I were lad, the TV was all American tulipe: Starsky and Hutch, Kojak, Hawaii Five-O and so on. At least we now have mostly UK stuff. Not that it's worth watching.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fungus
    replied
    Originally posted by Jabberwocky
    I really admire you and your fellow dung beetles dodgy. Rolling all that sh*t must take a lot out of you. I just wish you wouldn't keep posting it on here.
    Dick Rider is almost amusing these days. Well, on this occasion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jabberwocky
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent
    In other words you are an old fart
    I really admire you and your fellow dung beetles dodgy. Rolling all that sh*t must take a lot out of you. I just wish you wouldn't keep posting it on here.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    I thought the inbreeds who couldn't walk was particularly bad.

    Didn't see the programme, but it was widely reported, with pictures, in the press in Denmark.

    Poor people exposed for entertainment, quite sick.

    Leave a comment:


  • Denny
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent
    In other words you are an old fart
    I agree with Jabberwocky, if he's not pulling a stunt to get a reaction.

    The standard of TV programme making these days is abysmal. The BBC thrust their politically correct agenda down our throats, the commercial channels just show repeats and other reality TV garbage. We're all turning into jelly brains. I got a freeview box recently and hoped that would open my 'viewing pleasures' up to greater choice .....but alas no. Most of what I can see on there is worse than what I can see on terrestrial TV.

    What I hate most of all are these current trends, some of which have been around for a while now.

    (a) News broadcasts with newscasters chosen for their looks rather than their intellectual clarity and articulation skills. Have you seen an ugly woman presenter of them recently?

    (b) News broadcasts where jokes and puns are added as insertions to serious bulletins. Wrong place and time for jokes.

    (c) The trend toward docudramas. Whereby reality is merged with fantasy.

    (d) Any kind of celebrity news and TV gossip being subjected to news bulletins. Who cares who wins Celebrity Big Brother? I certainly don't want any mention of the show on Question Time or Newsnight thank you very much.

    (e) Unfettered voyeurism. Documentaries that pretend to inform and educate but are really scheduled to entertain us. Does anyone watch 'the fattest man in the world who weighs 50 stone to learn how to eat properly and exercise and really learn how someone could get into that state in the first place? Or do they watch it just to see how grotesque a 50 stone man looks and to have a snigger at his condition and how funny it looks seeing him sprawled out on a bed unable to turn over and seeing how far his belly hangs over the edge? Some programmes have deliberately exploited the 'unfortunate' - those who have grotesque facial distortions and disabilities and so on - and all of them, I suggest - are subjects chosen for their entertainment appeal and viewing figures not because such conditions relate to the majority of viewers who experience the same or could potential benefit from knowing more about these often rare medical conditions.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Jabberwocky
    Funny to the oily semi-illiterate working classes and the nouveau-riche maybe, but I am a middle class professional with extremely high standards.

    Play for Today, the News Quiz, Old Harry's Game, The World Tonight, Gardener's Question Time - these are the sort of programmes we should be making on TV.
    In other words you are an old fart

    Leave a comment:


  • John Galt
    replied
    This was a great episode - James May's face when his mum mentioned low profile tyres was priceless

    Leave a comment:


  • boredsenseless
    replied
    Originally posted by Mailman
    Anyone see Top Gear last night when they got their mums to test cars?

    Absolute classic TV...certainly much more entertaining (and educational at the same time, go figure? ) than that bullsh1t reality tv we get now thats for sure!

    For the record I thought Mrs May was delightful

    IF this was the quality of programming being released by the BBC then I would happily pay the tv tax. Unfortunately that is not the case and far too often Im fed some absolute crap about evil america through the baghdad broadcast companies rubbish news and current events programming!

    Mailman
    So you think the licence fee should be used to transmit repeats of programmes shown first nearly a year ago

    Although I did like the programme so it would have been worth a second look

    Leave a comment:


  • Jabberwocky
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill
    The man is funny as feck, try getting a humour transplant!

    I used to enjoy his column in "The Sunday Times".
    Funny to the oily semi-illiterate working classes and the nouveau-riche maybe, but I am a middle class professional with extremely high standards.

    Play for Today, the News Quiz, Old Harry's Game, The World Tonight, Gardener's Question Time - these are the sort of programmes we should be making on TV.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded
    Would it not then be more appropriate to insert rather than remove something.
    I am not getting into a discussion about inserting things up peoples botties!

    It ain't natural!

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Would it not then be more appropriate to insert rather than remove something.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded
    I am quite sure you're at the wrong end of the abdomen if that is the required outcome.
    He does spend most of the time talking out of his arse!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X