• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on ""We must be whiter than white" - Blair 1997"

Collapse

  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Yes.

    I've heard NL are planning to combine the cash for peerages with their drive for getting government service online to allow party donors (sorry lenders) to buy them online.

    View Basket:

    1 x Knighthood £1,356,045 (VAT not applicable)
    1 x Peerage £1,145,677 (VAT not applicable)

    Delivery expected : am Tuesday.

    Please note driver is not allowed to leave honours next door.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    If I had a spare million just sitting there Id donate it for a knighthood! Talk about score!

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    The Power Commission this month said every Labour donor who had given more than a million pounds had received a knighthood or a peerage.

    It's only fair.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Yes, the major parties are funded in numerous ways from the public purse.

    Leave a comment:


  • NoddY
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded
    No, they never pay off the loan, the creditor writes it off (aka 'converts it to a gift at a later date'), and almost certainly claims the loss against tax.

    It's only fair you see.
    If the debt is written off against tax, it suggests that the taxpayer is indirectly funding the Labour party.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Yes, but consider: when was the gift made?

    Leave a comment:


  • scotspine
    replied
    i think that key here is 'disappear off the radar'

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Originally posted by scotspine
    it was strongly suggested this morning on r4 today programme by a labour peer [lord wassname] that these loans would simply be allowed to disappear off the radar and eventually be written off...
    Shirley, at that point they become a gift and must be declared?

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    No, they never pay off the loan, the creditor writes it off (aka 'converts it to a gift at a later date'), and almost certainly claims the loss against tax.

    It's only fair you see.

    Leave a comment:


  • scotspine
    replied
    it was strongly suggested this morning on r4 today programme by a labour peer [lord wassname] that these loans would simply be allowed to disappear off the radar and eventually be written off...

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Forgive my ignorance, but just how would a political party pay off a loan?

    I assume the party has rules about members subscriptions and what they can be used to cover.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Those whom would dare criticise the Glorious NL Party are concealing Weapons of Mass Destruction.

    A message from the PM to Wendigo

    I did indeed say back then that we must be Whiter than White.
    But that was then this is now.

    Does that make sense ?

    Yes it does.
    No it doesnt.
    Yes it does.


    There.

    Perfect.
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 17 March 2006, 11:41.

    Leave a comment:


  • zathras
    replied
    Labour was secretly loaned £14m

    Labour was secretly loaned £14m

    The Labour Party has received a total of £13,950,000 in commercial loans from individuals, a spokesman has confirmed.
    The figure is more than three times the amount previously thought.
    .
    .
    .
    BBC2 Newsnight political editor Ms Kearney said there had been "deep-seated suspicion of these loans in the Labour Party for some time" and the practice had been "banned" under previous general secretaries David Triesman and Margaret McDonagh.

    There were "various theories" as to why the ban had been lifted ahead of the last election, she added, including the fact that the party had been short of cash.
    .
    .
    .
    Former Labour deputy leader Lord Hattersley has said that he is "horrified" by the sums being quoted.

    "It all demonstrates that the Labour Party leadership is too obsessed with the world of money. The Labour Party should not behave in this way," he told Newsnight.
    .
    .
    .
    On Thursday, Tony Blair admitted he had not told the Lords appointment committee three of his candidates for working peerages had given the party loans - which under the current rules did not have to be made public.

    Mr Blair said he took full responsibility for this and said he had made a mistake by not telling Labour's Treasurer Jack Dromey about the loans.
    .
    .
    .
    The prime minister also said he wanted an independent figure appointed to advise ministers on their financial interests - a move No 10 had rejected in the wake of the controversy surrounding the financial affairs of Tessa Jowell and her husband David Mills.
    .
    .
    .
    Meanwhile, Mr Dromey is carrying out an internal inquiry into the affair, which is due to report next week.

    The Conservatives said they would implement the recommendation of the Electoral Commission and voluntarily disclose details, including the source, of any future loans they received.
    .
    .
    .
    Meanwhile, the Scottish National Party has called on the Director of Public Prosecutions to use an 81-year-old law to investigate the row.

    Leave a comment:


  • scotspine
    replied
    but it's all about fairness isn't it?

    http://www.bytestart.co.uk/content/s...ue-threa.shtml

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    How about this for Whiter than White , remember this next time you pay Tax to Hector

    A provision exists in the UK for writing off tax bills where "strict application of the law would be oppressive and unfair".

    Charity begins at BP

    It's rarely used, but the government – very charitably – used it to write off £1.2 billion (approx US$ 2 billion) from the tax bill of BP (British Petroleum), Britain's richest company. (Daily Telegraph, 11/1/06)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X