"Why should you let your employer organise your pension for you? "
Coz they're even more efficient at stealing the money than insurance companies are?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Pensions and forced savings
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Pensions and forced savings"
Collapse
-
Guest replied
-
Guest repliedSeconded.
Milan.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedWhy should you let your employer organise your pension for you?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedIt has always struck me as odd that the pension fund is regarded as a company asset when it should be regarded as nothing to do with the company.
The law should never have allowed such a thing.
The share holders are the employees who pay into it, a nice company also adds extras but does not hold shares.
Why oh why oh why..... in this day and age......
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedI thought they were transferring the Rover worker's pension to Tesco?
Leave a comment:
-
Pensions and forced savings
Former MG Rover workers also remain in the dark over their pensions after a disagreement between independent trustees appointed to the schemes and the directors. An actuary is soon to determine how much liability Phoenix Venture Holdings, which remains trading, should bear. So far it has paid £1.7 million. Its solvency has prevented the pension schemes from entering the Government’s Pension Protection Fund.
Sh1t like the above where people save for retirement only to have all that hard earned money disappear on them when their company goes under cant have been completely unexpected by the group of morons who set up the current pension fiasco?
This is another reason Im paying as little tax as possible here in England :rollin
MailmanTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Leave a comment: