• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Satisfaction is...

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Satisfaction is..."

Collapse

  • thunderlizard
    replied
    On most of my contracts I end up decommissioning more code than I write. It's a good job nobody measures productivity in kLoCs any more. (Did they ever? I've read about a dozen books that say it's a useless measure, and zero books that say it's a decent one.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    Someone had done that before I started and there is no way I'm writing 250,000 lines of code
    Dunno. My second contract (in the 1980s) worked out at about a quid a line of code I wrote. That included decent comments. What would a 1986 quid be worth in today's currency?

    It's amazing how much code you can knock out with a bit of planning and a scripting language

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    No, satisfaction is replacing 50 lines of code with 2,500 lines of code and the only difference the client sees is an eye-watering invoice at the end of the month.

    Someone had done that before I started and there is no way I'm writing 250,000 lines of code

    Leave a comment:


  • 2BIT
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    replacing 2,500 lines of code with 50 lines of code and the only difference the client sees is the performance increase
    aw yeah! amen bro

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    replacing 2,500 lines of code with 50 lines of code and the only difference the client sees is the performance increase
    No, satisfaction is replacing 50 lines of code with 2,500 lines of code and the only difference the client sees is an eye-watering invoice at the end of the month.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    replacing 2,500 lines of code with 50 lines of code and the only difference the client sees is the performance increase
    SQL bolognese I presume?

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    Or you could have moved the code to a faster server and spent the rest of the day playing quake on your mobile

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    replacing 2,500 lines of code with 50 lines of code and the only difference the client sees is the performance increase
    Own up, 2450 lines were just comments

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    started a topic Satisfaction is...

    Satisfaction is...

    replacing 2,500 lines of code with 50 lines of code and the only difference the client sees is the performance increase

Working...
X