Originally posted by MaryPoppins
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Denouement
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Denouement"
Collapse
-
No, you've probably got a massively fat bottom from eating deep fried pies, easily reached by a midget.Originally posted by Incognito View PostWould you need a stool to reach it?

Leave a comment:
-
I could still kick your arse though.Originally posted by Incognito View PostMidget.

Leave a comment:
-
Shove it up your arse.Originally posted by Incognito View PostIn that case I apologise.
Leave a comment:
-
In that case I apologise. However, it is perfectly acceptable to respond to an observation. My point was that you don't have to agree with my view.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostI wasn't being picky about your grammar there; I was explaining why I'd answered what I assumed was a question.
Leave a comment:
-
I wasn't being picky about your grammar there; I was explaining why I'd answered what I assumed was a question.Originally posted by Incognito View PostA question can be an observation and I wouldn't start trying to be picky about other people's grammar when you massacre it so adequately yourself, love.
Leave a comment:
-
A question can be an observation and I wouldn't start trying to be picky about other people's grammar when you massacre it so adequately yourself, love.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostI will bow to your obvious superior intelligence on these matters; I'd simply assumed you were asking a question.
What with the use of the question mark: Is that not how a bully would define it?
<bow>
Trotting the bullying card out on me won't really get you anywhere, I'm afraid love.
Leave a comment:
-
I will bow to your obvious superior intelligence on these matters; I'd simply assumed you were asking a question.Originally posted by Incognito View PostWhere do you think I'm trying to get? I simply stated an observation, you don't have to agree with it. That's the beauty of existentialism. You don't have to feel you have to play up to the clique.

What with the use of the question mark: Is that not how a bully would define it?
<bow>
Leave a comment:
-
Where do you think I'm trying to get? I simply stated an observation, you don't have to agree with it. That's the beauty of existentialism. You don't have to feel you have to play up to the clique.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostNo, no. It wasn't a joke. I do think SY's a delusional tit. Trotting the bullying card out on me won't really get you anywhere, I'm afraid love.
I'm flattered though. Cheers!
Leave a comment:
-
No, no. It wasn't a joke. I do think SY's a delusional tit. Trotting the bullying card out on me won't really get you anywhere, I'm afraid love.Originally posted by Incognito View PostIs that not how a bully would define it? "I didn't mean anything by it, it was only a joke"
Funnily enough, I see you as a female version of MF. You two would have made a great couple.
Thanks for the rep by the way. Does that mean I'm part of the rep clique now?

I'm flattered though. Cheers!
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Today 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Yesterday 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Yesterday 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30

Leave a comment: