• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "If the UK is scrapping the Harrier..."

Collapse

  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    I'm a cockney who moved to Yorkshire, I never had a chance to begin with!
    Commiserations. Yorkshire by choice? No hope for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    That and the fact that you're from Yorkshire really f*cks up your chances, eh?
    I'm a cockney who moved to Yorkshire, I never had a chance to begin with!

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    I knew it before QI, but then again I was a socailly inept child and lacked friends so read a lot
    That and the fact that you're from Yorkshire really f*cks up your chances, eh?

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by Pogle View Post
    Yes, I watch QI too
    I knew it before QI, but then again I was a socailly inept child and lacked friends so read a lot

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    **OFF TOPIC ALERT**

    Did you know the inventor of Subbuteo wanted to call it "HOBBY" but couldn't get the trademake so used the latin name of the Bird Of Pray called Hobby
    you are getting confused. A hobby is a bird of prey.
    You were thinking of the Italian wine, kestrel. The name was already taken by a beer, so they called it Blue Nun, after a bird of pray



    god, im bored

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Let me know when they are scrapping some reasonably good APCs.

    HTH
    You can buy those now.

    News article

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Let me know when they are scrapping some reasonably good APCs.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogle
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    **OFF TOPIC ALERT**

    Did you know the inventor of Subbuteo wanted to call it "HOBBY" but couldn't get the trademake so used the latin name of the Bird Of Pray called Hobby
    Yes, I watch QI too

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Because the Septics are running everything and they don't like us, especially when we do something that is cleverer than them, eg Concorde.

    To be fair, they did buy the Harrier and represent it as US technology (as I noticed when I visited the NASA museum in Washington DC).

    As far as buying one goes - no doubt we're shipping the last few off to the remaining dodgy dictatorships we are mates with this week.
    ISTR that the US as NATO partner vetoed our sale of Harriers to China some years ago, then sold a batch of aircraft to the Chinese themselves instead.

    Our relationship with the USA is indeed a special one.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by minsky1 View Post
    Couple this with the cost of getting it airworthy again and getting the original parts suppliers to buy back in to make parts for maintenance, and it gets very expensive.
    At least they have a Haynes manual available!!

    Leave a comment:


  • minsky1
    replied
    [QUOTE=ratewhore;1302839]
    Originally posted by minsky1 View Post
    Email Kevin Stone, the crew chief of the vulcan to the sky project ..... he will put you in touch with the right people.
    QUOTE]

    Otherwise known as Taff when I used to work with him...

    ...interesting news about them buying a Harrier though.
    Yep.... presumably the Harrier would be a much cheaper daily runabout (than the Vulcan). I think he mentioned the Vulcan cost around 15k a day to run at airshows. Couple this with the cost of getting it airworthy again and getting the original parts suppliers to buy back in to make parts for maintenance, and it gets very expensive.

    Running a Harrier or two in comparison would be no problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    **OFF TOPIC ALERT**

    Did you know the inventor of Subbuteo wanted to call it "HOBBY" but couldn't get the trademake so used the latin name of the Bird Of Pray called Hobby
    I didn't, but it's interesting in one of those schoolboy nerdy ways

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    [QUOTE=minsky1;1302812]Email Kevin Stone, the crew chief of the vulcan to the sky project ..... he will put you in touch with the right people.
    QUOTE]

    Otherwise known as Taff when I used to work with him...

    ...interesting news about them buying a Harrier though.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by pacharan View Post
    There was one on eBay for 60k a few weeks ago.

    On the subject of harriers, did you know that the Latin name for Hobby is Falco Subbuteo? Funny play on words that.
    **OFF TOPIC ALERT**

    Did you know the inventor of Subbuteo wanted to call it "HOBBY" but couldn't get the trademake so used the latin name of the Bird Of Pray called Hobby

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    not an expert, but I understand that the main strength of vtol was in the dogfight. this was halved in effectiveness with the hi tech heat seeking air to air, then almost negated by the 360 heat seeking air to air. (i.e. you can fire a heat seeker at the front of an enemy from 12 miles away , then turn and go home)
    still useful for taking off from a jungle clearing, but just not enough jungles these days


    Isn't it more to do with vectored thrust and the ability to keep an inherently unstable piece of composite in the air by technology now?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X