• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Plate tectonics

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Plate tectonics"

Collapse

  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View Post
    The one? The one? What "one" that runs through Iceland? If you mean a tectonic subduction zone, that's new since I did Geology. If you mean a cool guy with dark glasses, he wouldn't run, he'd just fly. If you mean a divergent boundary, that's not going to give us 8.9 quakes and a 10m tsunami.
    WHS - a rift isn't going to give massive earthquakes. But, over the course of a few millennia, it could be a good property investment since it's growing every year.

    That said, having walked to the end of Chain of Craters Road, that might not be a totally sensible thing

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Please stop being so sensible and panic blindly like the rest of us.
    Apologies.

    OK, have you all heard about the La Palma Megatsunami? A huge block of rock, about half the island of La Palma in the Canary Islands, will drop into the sea sometime, causing mega tsunamis all round the Atlantic coasts. We're doomed.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View Post
    The one? The one? What "one" that runs through Iceland? If you mean a tectonic subduction zone, that's new since I did Geology. If you mean a cool guy with dark glasses, he wouldn't run, he'd just fly. If you mean a divergent boundary, that's not going to give us 8.9 quakes and a 10m tsunami.
    Please stop being so sensible and panic blindly like the rest of us.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    I think we should be more worried about the one that runs through the middle of Iceland. Especially as Iceland is now a poor country and can no longer afford all the blue tack and gaffer tape to hold the Eurasian and Carribean plates together.

    The one? The one? What "one" that runs through Iceland? If you mean a tectonic subduction zone, that's new since I did Geology. If you mean a cool guy with dark glasses, he wouldn't run, he'd just fly. If you mean a divergent boundary, that's not going to give us 8.9 quakes and a 10m tsunami.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    The panic on financial markets is another matter; that's all about airheads worrying that clever people can't solve problems.
    First I laughed, because the comment is so apropos. Then I got depressed, for the same reason.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Didn't they have their turn last year with a volcano?
    Nahhhhhhh!!!!! That was just a smokescreen. So they could pinch more of our Cod I expect!

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    I think we should be more worried about the one that runs through the middle of Iceland. Especially as Iceland is now a poor country and can no longer afford all the blue tack and gaffer tape to hold the Eurasian and Carribean plates together.

    Didn't they have their turn last year with a volcano?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    I think we should be more worried about the one that runs through the middle of Iceland. Especially as Iceland is now a poor country and can no longer afford all the blue tack and gaffer tape to hold the Eurasian and Carribean plates together.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    You are Alistair MacLean and I claim my 5 pounds.
    Maybe that was the inspiration for Bill Hicks to daydream about Arizona Bay. Seeing as that was over 20 years ago, my popcorn's gone soggy waiting.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I think some Bond type villian planted a nuke on the sea bed to trigger the earthquake.

    NZ never paid the ransom, neither did Japan, if the States does not pay up California will be next.
    You are Alistair MacLean and I claim my 5 pounds.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    I think some Bond type villian planted a nuke on the sea bed to trigger the earthquake.

    NZ never paid the ransom, neither did Japan, if the States does not pay up California will be next.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    San Andreas is mainly two plates rubbing past each other, rather than one being subducted (plus all sorts of other geological nastiness and cross faults etc.). Earthquakes in Japan and the Pacific shouldn't impact the likelihood of an earthquake in California one way or the other.
    Juan de Fuca Plate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Was that really his name? Nice bloke??

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I don't think the age of the plates has anything to do with it. But the San Andreas fault it basically the same two plates moving against each other isn't it. Although their are separate fault zones so there is probably no correlation. I just thought if the pacific plate were suddenly moving a lot for some reason, e.g. a great big lump of molten rock ascending in the mantle, that this might not be the last of it.

    And of course, Godzilla might still be hungry.
    San Andreas is mainly two plates rubbing past each other, rather than one being subducted (plus all sorts of other geological nastiness and cross faults etc.). Earthquakes in Japan and the Pacific shouldn't impact the likelihood of an earthquake in California one way or the other.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Gonzo View Post
    I'm no expert, I only did this stuff at school, but I am sure that the plates are not recent creations so the chances of the US West Coast shaking are no more or less likely than they were last week.

    hth
    I don't think the age of the plates has anything to do with it. But the San Andreas fault it basically the same two plates moving against each other isn't it. Although their are separate fault zones so there is probably no correlation. I just thought if the pacific plate were suddenly moving a lot for some reason, e.g. a great big lump of molten rock ascending in the mantle, that this might not be the last of it.

    And of course, Godzilla might still be hungry.
    Last edited by doodab; 12 March 2011, 07:17.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gonzo
    replied
    Originally posted by Lightship
    According to Wikipedia, this particular earthquake was not caused by movement in tectonic plates.


    While on one hand that is in bad taste, insensitive and should not be condoned, on the other hand I find it hilarious.




    This is from someone that now lives in a risk zone and doesn't expect anyone's pity should the inevitable happen during my lifetime.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X