Anyways, I dont think we are talking about scientists. We are talking about climate scientists, and not even all of those.
We are talking about a group of people who rely on models and statistical analysis instead of field work and measurements, who rely on the old boy network instead of peer review, who rely on propoganda instead of free thinking, who try to bully and browbeat instead of listening, and who believe the most important thing is to feel rather than know.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Compare and contrast - Scientists are always right all the time, never question"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Posthang on just a minute. I may not be a holocaust denier, but can I at least be akin to a child abuser for flying across the Atlantic ? please
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostScience is never 'settled'.
No you are not akin to holocaust deniers. I wouldn't equate a difference of opinion on the causes of climate variations to denying genocide.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostBrilliant!
Win win.
Perhaps they'll just flip-flop back and forth to fit the data / weather / climate as they see fit.
It's all CO2 innit. Makes it snow, not snow, hot, then cold, then hot, rain then drought, and sometimes it doesn't do anything is all stays the same.
ARC - Anthropogenic Random Climate.
Save the world from a randomly changing climate, that can't be predicted or controlled!
BTW have you immunised your children yet? There are some dissenting voices about child immunization you know.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostScience moves on. If scientists had all the answers they'd stop.
Win win.
Perhaps they'll just flip-flop back and forth to fit the data / weather / climate as they see fit.
It's all CO2 innit. Makes it snow, not snow, hot, then cold, then hot, rain then drought, and sometimes it doesn't do anything is all stays the same.
ARC - Anthropogenic Random Climate.
Save the world from a randomly changing climate, that can't be predicted or controlled!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostAnd can anyone question any of this ongoing contradiction, or is the science "settled" and we are all akin to holocaust deniers?
No you are not akin to holocaust deniers. I wouldn't equate a difference of opinion on the causes of climate variations to denying genocide.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostBut then ten years or so later it started snowing all over the world. A lot of snow, and so statistically speaking it was now snowing a lot more, so they are predicting a very hot world all covered in snow.
Leave a comment:
-
And can anyone question any of this ongoing contradiction, or is the science "settled" and we are all akin to holocaust deniers?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostIn other words, your science is worth and tells us nothing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pjclarkeGlobal warming does not mean that the whole planet is warming uniformly, how could it? Science moves on, our understanding now is better than it was when the press reports from the best part of a decade ago appeared. Get used to it.
Or are you saying you didn't have a clue then and we can put no faith in your "predictions" now?
In other words, your science is worth and tells us nothing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thunderlizard View PostLikewise,
people keep telling me that it's going to get sunnier over the next 3-6 months. I don't believe a word of it, because when I looked out of the window at 3:00 this morning it was completely pitch black.
Leave a comment:
-
Likewise,
people keep telling me that it's going to get sunnier over the next 3-6 months. I don't believe a word of it, because when I looked out of the window at 3:00 this morning it was completely pitch black.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Today 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Yesterday 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Leave a comment: