Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Wow! - that's the kind of advice I like, and in all likelihood am most likely to follow - not being the type to unduly rock the boat unless absolutely necessary. Interesting to read a range of views on the matter though and to note that, reading between the lines, the prevailing view is towards engaging with this kind of discussion. Given the somewhat cynical disposition of the CUK forum, I'm surprised to say the least!
I think if you ask real questions here you will get usable answers. Some threads are just posted for a laugh, and get suitable replies.
Be part of the process use 'we' a lot. Don't slate the vision, find out before the key message and sneakily find out what the drivers behind it are and it's objectives.
Be proactive and ask questions which reinforce the
vision but are challenging enough that makes you stand out.
For example at a WW conference call for a major Cloud
computing company some bright spark asked the CEO about whether the vision was aligned with government thinking around carbon footprint and the green agenda and whether we had the ear of congress. Gave the CEO the opportunity to tell the story of his meeting with Obama.
Little research pays off.
Wow! - that's the kind of advice I like, and in all likelihood am most likely to follow - not being the type to unduly rock the boat unless absolutely necessary. Interesting to read a range of views on the matter though and to note that, reading between the lines, the prevailing view is towards engaging with this kind of discussion. Given the somewhat cynical disposition of the CUK forum, I'm surprised to say the least!
Be part of the process use 'we' a lot. Don't slate the vision, find out before the key message and sneakily find out what the drivers behind it are and it's objectives.
Be proactive and ask questions which reinforce the
vision but are challenging enough that makes you stand out.
For example at a WW conference call for a major Cloud
computing company some bright spark asked the CEO about whether the vision was aligned with government thinking around carbon footprint and the green agenda and whether we had the ear of congress. Gave the CEO the opportunity to tell the story of his meeting with Obama.
I've been asked to attend a meeting to get a face-to-face presentation regarding company vision, with a view to providing direct feedback. This is going to happen within the context of a team meeting, which I'd normally be happy enough to attend, on the basis that contributing to the team dynamic, pooling knowledge and mentoring junior members etc is part and parcel of the service I've been contracted to provide. Critiquing the company vision however is waaay outside of my remit IMHO, and falls under the umbrella of all of the politics, red-tape and BS meetings that I have thus far been very happy to avoid in my fairly new freelance status.
It doesn't seem like I'm going to be able to dodge the bullet this time, and wondered whether any of you seasoned veterans might have some advice on how to deal with this and other such scenarios in a diplomatic fashion?
Leave a comment: