Originally posted by Board Game Geek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Global data storage calculated at 295 exabytes"
Collapse
-
Yep, the compression ratio could be great. Probably a single hard drive would cover the lot.
-
What the study failed to disclose was that 99.99% of the storage was for porn. The other .01% was just worthless junk.The study, published in the journal Science, calculates the amount of data stored in the world by 2007 as 295 exabytes.
Leave a comment:
-
Global data storage calculated at 295 exabytes
The study, published in the journal Science, calculates the amount of data stored in the world by 2007 as 295 exabytes.
That is the equivalent of 1.2 billion average hard drives.
BBC News - Global data storage calculated at 295 exabytes
Or, less impressively, by my calculation:
295 exabytes = 295 * 10^18 bytes = 2.36*10^21 bits.
If each bit were represented by the presence or absence of a helium atom of diameter 32*10^(-12)m, the sum of all human knowledge could be contained in a cube with sides 0.4mm. Or about the size, if not taste, of a grain of sugar. Not sure what it would taste like, not much probably and it wouldn't even make your voice go appreciably higher. And if a bit were instead the size of a plank length, the cube would have sides 1*10^23 times smaller than that. Much smaller than an atom and too small to be seen with any instrument, save particle smashers. Wow
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Today 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Yesterday 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03

Leave a comment: