Originally posted by OwlHoot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Bank bosses "livid" about additional levy"
Collapse
-
Bank levy is NOT one off tax - Liebors tax on bonuses was and they now whine that Cons don't raise as much ffs Liebor said it was ONE OFF tax.
-
Most likely the whole thing has been stage managed - The Government lets the banks off the hook, with a one-off (?) trifling tax of 800 million, on condition they agree to put on a pantomime show of apoplectic outrage, for the sheeple to lap up and improve the coalition's ratings. I wonder what HAB reckons - he hasn't been around for a while.
Leave a comment:
-
My solution is similar. A quick glance at a map of the area shows that the whole Isle of Dogs could sealed off quite easily, by digging through the West Ferry Roundabout and letting the water flood in from the West, and by destroying the Trafalgar Way bridge in the East. The investment banking community could be left to contemplate its actions on the resulting island for, say, five years. After that we'd reconnect them to the rest of London and see if they want to do things differently next time.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostWhen I read about this kind of thing, my gut instinct is to say 'set fire to the bastards'. Then I stop for a moment, think about my feelings and try to rationalise my thoughts to provide a more constructive suggestion as to how to deal with this kind of issue. Line the bastards up on top of Canary Wharf and push them off one by one.
Leave a comment:
-
The Chinese economy is very shortly going to be fubar.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostIndeed; when they succeed in plunging China into a major economic crisis using all sorts of credit derivative jiggery pokery, they should not expect a very merciful response from the Chinese communist party.
When all the peasants realise they're not getting theirs there'll be another uprising.
Leave a comment:
-
Indeed; when they succeed in plunging China into a major economic crisis using all sorts of credit derivative jiggery pokery, they should not expect a very merciful response from the Chinese communist party.Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostThese banks will shortly be leaving town anyhow. China and the rise of the Asian economies will almost surely make it far more profitable to be there. I say let them f**k up the world again so the Chinese can hang them....by their nuts.
Leave a comment:
-
Didn't someone suggest that before, and the banks - with hands firmly on Number 10's balls - "suggest" that wasn't the way?Originally posted by sasguru View PostIts silly slagging off all the banks.
The ones that got taxpayers money should pay it back at the usurious rates of interest they would normally charge.
After that, regulation should be put into place maybe splitting off the constructive banking from the more speculative type, so they can't ahrm the economy again.
And after that, they are private companies so leave them the fook alone.
Leave a comment:
-
These banks will shortly be leaving town anyhow. China and the rise of the Asian economies will almost surely make it far more profitable to be there. I say let them f**k up the world again so the Chinese can hang them....by their nuts.
Leave a comment:
-
Its silly slagging off all the banks.
The ones that got taxpayers money should pay it back at the usurious rates of interest they would normally charge.
After that, regulation should be put into place maybe splitting off the constructive banking from the more speculative type, so they can't ahrm the economy again.
And after that, they are private companies so leave them the fook alone.
Leave a comment:
-
They might just find a shortage of customers in other countries who are willing to put up with extortionate bank charges and dodgy business practices.Originally posted by thunderlizard View PostAbsolutely. As they've been saying, they're easily able to move to a more favourable country at the drop of a hat. All talk, no walk?
Leave a comment:
-
Absolutely. As they've been saying, they're easily able to move to a more favourable country at the drop of a hat. All talk, no walk?Originally posted by Jog On View Postwhat's all the fuss about?
Leave a comment:
-
When I read about this kind of thing, my gut instinct is to say 'set fire to the bastards'. Then I stop for a moment, think about my feelings and try to rationalise my thoughts to provide a more constructive suggestion as to how to deal with this kind of issue. Line the bastards up on top of Canary Wharf and push them off one by one.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostMash on the ball again.
The Daily Mash - We spend £2.5bn getting our balls fluffed, say bank chiefs
That's a good one.
Leave a comment:
-
Mash on the ball again.
The Daily Mash - We spend £2.5bn getting our balls fluffed, say bank chiefs
Leave a comment:
-
I particularly like this bit:
A senior banker said "this feels a bit like the last soldier killed before the armistice - if there is an armistice."
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Today 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Yesterday 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45

Leave a comment: