• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Half of City bankers receive bigger bonus than last year"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Freamon View Post
    Bzzt, wrong again I'm afraid.


    Public
    I said EN MASSE.

    It was under Brown that this PFI tulip was used to put a lot of debt off the balance sheet in order to borrow more.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    The Tories may have invented it and the city may have given them the means to do it, but only Labour rushed headlong into it. Give the chavs a bunch of brand new hospitals and schools and they will be too thick to understand how they were paid for. Then the next lot will have to pay for them while at the same time trying to reduce a huge deficit. The whole PFI thing in the UK is bordering on criminal. How can the deficit be so high when the capital for all these major programs has been brought about largely through PFI?

    Leave a comment:


  • Freamon
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Mr Gordon Brown - he did it "en masse".
    Bzzt, wrong again I'm afraid.

    In 1992, however, the Conservative government of John Major in the United Kingdom introduced the private finance initiative (PFI),[2] the first systematic programme aimed at encouraging public–private partnerships.
    Public

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Mr Gordon Brown - he did it "en masse".
    Oi! AtW. Stow it. They'll be after Company Directors with 401K pension plans next!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    Out of interest (I honestly can't remember) who started the whole PFI thing to off book public spending?
    Mr Gordon Brown - he did it "en masse".

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Out of interest (I honestly can't remember) who started the whole PFI thing to off book public spending? I've a feeling it was the last Tory government towards the end of their reign, but I'd be happy to be corrected.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alf W
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Would you say Nu Liebor's contribution to UK Plc in the past 10 years has been positive or negative?

    It wasn't ze City who signed off those PFI contracts you know - it wasn't ze City who borrowed lots of money to waste it on public expenditure that did not actualy create much meaningful in return. FFS, compared to Nu Liebor ze bankers are really nice fluffy cute animals they are!
    'Anonymous' -ve Reputation posted against me

    nu liebor lover
    All because I called him a Muppet on an earlier thread for not having a grasp of GCSE level Maths.

    So, do we have an answer? I'm interested in the actual answer. If the City has generated 10x what it has taken in bail outs over 10 years then maybe that message should be put forward to silence the detractors and let them get on with it. If they have failed to wash their face then all this talk about upping sticks and moving to another country should be stamped on.

    For the record, I agree that far too much money has been p1ssed up the wall and into the pockets of consultancy companies. Nu Liebor, in many ways, were just Tory-Lites.

    Leave a comment:


  • Freamon
    replied
    In other news, the other half of "City Bankers" received a smaller bonus than last year.

    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Would you say Nu Liebor's contribution to UK Plc in the past 10 years has been positive or negative?

    It wasn't ze City who signed off those PFI contracts you know - it wasn't ze City who borrowed lots of money to waste it on public expenditure that did not actualy create much meaningful in return. FFS, compared to Nu Liebor ze bankers are really nice fluffy cute animals they are!
    <whispers>Actually it was ze City who set up the financial structures that PFI relies on, just so you know.</whispers>

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Glass and houses spring to mind.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Alf W View Post
    Has anyone worked out if, over the past 5 or 10 years, the net contribution of the finance industry to UK Plc has been positive or negative?
    Would you say Nu Liebor's contribution to UK Plc in the past 10 years has been positive or negative?

    It wasn't ze City who signed off those PFI contracts you know - it wasn't ze City who borrowed lots of money to waste it on public expenditure that did not actualy create much meaningful in return. FFS, compared to Nu Liebor ze bankers are really nice fluffy cute animals they are!

    Leave a comment:


  • Alf W
    replied
    Has anyone worked out if, over the past 5 or 10 years, the net contribution of the finance industry to UK Plc has been positive or negative? If it's positive then maybe they are getting a bad press and we were right to bail them out. If it's negative then we should just ****-em over.

    Genuine question. I really don't know the answer.

    Leave a comment:


  • moorfield
    replied
    Good. We need wunches of bankers spending money to get us out of the latest weather induced hole we're in.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    started a topic Half of City bankers receive bigger bonus than last year

    Half of City bankers receive bigger bonus than last year

    On average, bankers said they had received a bonus worth £84,409 for 2010, with 49pc saying their pay-out this year was larger than last year.

    The findings came in a survey of 654 UK-based bankers conducted by financial sector jobs website eFinancialCareers.

    According to the survey, top-performing staff have received up to 40pc of their total pay for 2010 in the form of bonuses.

    Across the board, bonuses are said to be up about 5pc on last year, although about a quarter of those surveyed said their bonus was smaller than the one they received in 2010.

    Source: Half of City bankers receive bigger bonus than last year - Telegraph

    --------

    That's a good thing - the more bonuses bankers paid the more tax they pay, and therefore less cuts and less tax will be levied from the remaining population "too stupid" or "too unfortunate" to be a high flying City Banker.

Working...
X