- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The official "guess GDP change in Q1 2011" thread"
Collapse
-
Here are the last four quarters' results, pinched from a reply to a BBC article, so don't blame me if they're wrong
2010 Q1 GDP - 0.3% (revised up from 0.2%)
2010 Q2 GDP - 1.2% (revised up from 1.1%)
2010 Q3 GDP - 0.7% (revised down from 0.8%)
2010 Q4 GDP - -0.5% (yet to be revised)
If you allow for Labour engineering an artificially high value of 1.2% prior to the election, and the snow last winter maybe reducing the Q4 figure by 0.2, it looks like a downward trend, like that U boat in Das Boot diving with the bow planes jammed.
So I'd guess -0.5% again
edit: It was widely expected that the VAT rate rise from 17.5% to 20% at the start of this year would stimulate demand towards the end of last year. So if the result was -0.5%, one assumes there wasn't enough incentive to spend then and presumably even less now it is 20% !Last edited by OwlHoot; 25 January 2011, 22:32.
Leave a comment:
-
+0.1%, just enough to avoid a technical recession, artificially supported by the extra demand that was delayed in December due to the snow.
I also suspect the Q4 10 GDP will be revised up to -0.4% or -0.3%.
Leave a comment:
-
Who cares?
Sorry darling, no Moulard duck foie gras with pickled pear and 1999 Château Haut Bernasse Montbazillac tonight dear, GDP has fallen 0.2%.
Leave a comment:
-
-0.4%
Nudged up from last quarter by sales of Will and Kate memorabilia.
Leave a comment:
-
The official "guess GDP change in Q1 2011" thread
You can guess only one, posts from sockies will be ignored.
Rules: whoever closest to first official figure due to be announced in April 2011 wins.
I start: GDP in Q1 2011 will drop by 0.2%.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: