• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Stargazing Live

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Stargazing Live"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    She's not exactly a geek though, is she?

    Not in the approved byte counting fashion.
    I was quite impressed with her professionalism (compared to the other two), made more difficult by her being at 5000m, I gather, even if she did say the altitude using feet units.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    That said, the babe in Hawaii seemed interesting.
    Liz Bonnin?

    I certainly would. I can't say that very often about geeks.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Watched all 3 episodes, thoroughly entertained. Thought the dual presentation between Dara and Brian was great, Dara does the confused look so well - funny stuff.

    We need more of this TV this is what I'm happy paying my license fee towards, easily overtakes all the other crap that's broadcast.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by lightng View Post
    This really is drawing a pair of hairy ones under the school desk taken to the nth.[/URL]
    It's small Space Programme syndrome.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    That said, the babe in Hawaii seemed interesting.
    The guy in the field knew his stuff - or dare I say it, was an expert in the field. Dara O'Briain was tulip.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    It's a telescope. It has to be long to enable the correct focal lengths of its lenses to be exploited. Any other equipment is strapped to the sides. Would you suggest that an extra half a tonne of cladding and plastic padding be added to make it look like a reliant robin?

    What shape would you suggest?
    I'm waiting to see what the docking station will look like.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    It's a telescope. It has to be long to enable the correct focal lengths of its lenses to be exploited. Any other equipment is strapped to the sides. Would you suggest that an extra half a tonne of cladding and plastic padding be added to make it look like a reliant robin?

    What shape would you suggest?
    Little girl: "Reverend, why is there a metal chicken on the church roof?"

    Vicar: "That is not a metal chicken. It is a weather cock. It shows which way the wind is blowing."

    Little girl: "Why is it shaped like a cock?"

    Vicar: "Because if it was shaped like a fanny, the wind would blow straight through it."




    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Anyone been watching? I could make some critical remarks about the content and presentation, but what caught my eye was this:



    The XMM Newton telescope.

    I appreciate that homo sapiens are the animal that never grew up and that certain shapes are ideally suited to spacetravel, which by remarkable coincidence also happens to coincide with attribute 1, but haven't scientists gone a bit overboard with this space phallus? Is this a testament to the pinnacle of human achievement, to place the most willy shaped object in orbit about mother Earth under thinly disguised pretence at scientific endeavour? To boldly put the biggest most cock shaped thing in to Earth orbit as never designed before?

    Also, why weren't the Pioneer spacecraft cock-shaped?
    It's a telescope. It has to be long to enable the correct focal lengths of its lenses to be exploited. Any other equipment is strapped to the sides. Would you suggest that an extra half a tonne of cladding and plastic padding be added to make it look like a reliant robin?

    What shape would you suggest?

    Leave a comment:


  • lightng
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    To boldly put the biggest most cock shaped thing in to Earth orbit as never designed before?

    Also, why weren't the Pioneer spacecraft cock-shaped?
    This really is drawing a pair of hairy ones under the school desk taken to the nth. Wonder if the same engineers are looking at designing a mother ship.

    It looks like a giant ...
    Last edited by lightng; 6 January 2011, 07:31.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Saw most of the first one on Monday and about half of yesterdays.

    If the aim is to make Astronomy more accessible then, overall, I think it will work as the programme is enjoyable and informative.

    However, for me, the presenting style as well as the overly casual dress of the presenters is a little off putting.

    The Prof (Brian Cox) is pretty poor at presenting and clearly outside of his comfort zone.

    He can't seem to stand still and needs to be strapped behind a desk and told to stick to the sciency bits.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    You can pretty much guarantee that whenever there's a celestial event viewable from the UK the sky turns 'cloudy' for the entire duration.

    Good program though.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Also, why weren't the Pioneer spacecraft cock-shaped?
    Because they had a knob and boobies etched permanently onto them:



    (She's got no pubes!)


    Edit: Link to HUGE version: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...r10-plaque.jpg
    Last edited by RichardCranium; 5 January 2011, 15:12. Reason: Changed to a MUCH smaller image

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    started a topic Stargazing Live

    Stargazing Live

    Anyone been watching? I could make some critical remarks about the content and presentation, but what caught my eye was this:



    The XMM Newton telescope.

    I appreciate that homo sapiens are the animal that never grew up and that certain shapes are ideally suited to spacetravel, which by remarkable coincidence also happens to coincide with attribute 1, but haven't scientists gone a bit overboard with this space phallus? Is this a testament to the pinnacle of human achievement, to place the most willy shaped object in orbit about mother Earth under thinly disguised pretence at scientific endeavour? To boldly put the biggest most cock shaped thing in to Earth orbit as never designed before?

    Also, why weren't the Pioneer spacecraft cock-shaped?
Working...
X