• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: BTL'ers doomed.

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "BTL'ers doomed."

Collapse

  • Freamon
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Eh?

    Taper Relief is gone already - thanks Darling!
    Well there you go, just shows it can be done.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    The interesting thing about being a BTL'er is that it is very hard for the government to target BTL landlords without either clobbering normal mortgaged homeowners and/or their tenants as renters.
    They could always remove mortgage interest tax relief. That would cut into yields quite nicely...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Freamon View Post
    removing some of the taper relief on this.
    Eh?

    Taper Relief is gone already - thanks Darling!

    Leave a comment:


  • Freamon
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    The interesting thing about being a BTL'er is that it is very hard for the government to target BTL landlords without either clobbering normal mortgaged homeowners and/or their tenants as renters.

    Therefore it is recession proof and in the long term a million times better than some greasy pension fund spiv taking any of your hard earned.

    BTL'ers Boomed I'd say.
    Why is it hard? They already charge CGT with 100% relief for owner occupiers - they could target BTLers by removing some of the taper relief on this. Also, there's already separate box on the tax return for "income from property", so they could increase the rate of tax on this category.

    Not hard at all really.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    The interesting thing about being a BTL'er is that it is very hard for the government to target BTL landlords without either clobbering normal mortgaged homeowners and/or their tenants as renters.

    Therefore it is recession proof and in the long term a million times better than some greasy pension fund spiv taking any of your hard earned.

    BTL'ers Boomed I'd say.
    What Numbnuts says.

    BTL is still a good longterm investment and should be used as part as an overall investment strategy.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    BTL - Stick with it for the long term. At the end of the day someone has bought you a house.
    The interesting thing about being a BTL'er is that it is very hard for the government to target BTL landlords without either clobbering normal mortgaged homeowners and/or their tenants as renters.

    Therefore it is recession proof and in the long term a million times better than some greasy pension fund spiv taking any of your hard earned.

    BTL'ers Boomed I'd say.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    BTL - Stick with it for the long term. At the end of the day someone has bought you a house.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    My man Jeeves just misread this thread title and is now very worried his job is in jeopardy. I've asked Nurse to take him for a lie down.

    Leave a comment:


  • centurian
    replied
    The Government is trying to encourage councils and developers to build more homes to suppress the market and make it easier for first-time buyers to get on to the housing ladder.
    Total and utter bollards - they're making it harder to build more homes by giving local people a veto on new home developments - a veto which they will almost always exercise because they won't want their local market "suppressed".

    But as to how it affect BTL's - depends on how good an investment they make. Once interest rates normalise in 1-2 years, annual yields will be roughly the same as sticking your money in the bank, but with much more risk.

    Now the amateur BTL didn't care about average yields - as long as the mortgage was paid, they knew they could double their money in 5-10 years due to rising house prices. That's the kicker that's no longer there.

    You can still make money from BTL, but you will have to be considerably more canny
    Last edited by centurian; 3 January 2011, 18:28.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
    Nice. So my kid's education costs more, which means I cannot afford to put by as much for my twighlight years. Pensions aren't worth it. And now good old bricks and mortar is going to stagnate until I retire.

    Time to get into stocks and shares methinks. Oh no, wait.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Same here.

    BTW I thought you were in Sydney?
    I did. Worked on a five year basis when I started buying in1999. Bought three, sold them, paid mortgage off and then bought a large place by borrowing more. Now only a few years to go to pay that off.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Never seen my house as an asset or an investment, it is a home.
    Same here.

    BTW I thought you were in Sydney?

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Never seen my house as an asset or an investment, it is a home.
    WHS.

    Even though I let my first house i'm the least savvy person on the planet when it comes to investments, at the time my job changed and I expected to return to my home expect that never happened.

    I think focus should be on earnings and not house prices, even if they have run away with themselves a little. The rate earnings have increased over the last 15 years are the biggest con IMO. My first job as a graduate started around 18K (13 years ago), I've seen the same job advertised around 22K today. True inflation is not even matched with that increase.

    Over the last 15 years the reward for increased labour has been to take home less and less. What an insult to the ordinary man and woman on the street whilst the bureaucrats have been lining their pockets with factious expenses.

    What we need is a full blown revolution.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Housing prices will stagnate for the next 15 to 20 years.

    There will be no drop with interest rates as they are.

    Never seen my house as an asset or an investment, it is a home.

    Leave a comment:


  • Freamon
    replied
    Gordon Brown said almost exactly the same thing when he was starting out and look where that got us.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X