• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Why the Lockerbie Bomber was released"

Collapse

  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    It was all going to end up very messy when the appeal got to court and I doubt the trial would have lasted more than a day.

    The USA has dragged the UK into their problems for the last 10 years and quite frankly they have no right to be lecturing the Scottish Legal system on matters of human rights.
    Indeed. It was the Scottish Government's decision to make, and it was extremely polite of them not to point out that the operators of Guantanamo Bay prison camp were ill-placed to criticise others' penal policies.

    Justice Secretary MacAskill's refusal to answer to a US inquiry was for me the best thing the Scottish Government has done so far. All free Englishmen should be cheering their neighbours on that one.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    It was all going to end up very messy when the appeal got to court and I doubt the trial would have lasted more than a day.

    The USA has dragged the UK into their problems for the last 10 years and quite frankly they have no right to be lecturing the Scottish Legal system on matters of human rights.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    The two theories that I would go for on the bombing is either it was Iran in retribution for the US shooting down the Iran-air Airbus or the bomb was discovered an early stage in Germany and it was then ‘made-safe’ and was being sent to the US for forensics. The latter was normal practice at time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
    From the Wail today



    Oh dear... oh dear....
    Oh dear indeed. Megrahi's release was nothing to do with the UK agreement, so it hardly matters what plans Jack Straw might have made about him. But that's the Mail.

    Leave a comment:


  • CheeseSlice
    replied
    Originally posted by Gonzo View Post
    Releasing him put an end to the potential embarrassment.
    From the Wail today

    The U.S. documents, released last night by the WikiLeaks website, reveal Libyan officials ‘convinced UK embassy officers that the consequences if Megrahi were to die in prison… would be harsh, immediate and not easily remedied’.

    Among the ‘specific threats’ were the ‘immediate cessation of all UK commercial activity in Libya, a diminishing or severing of political ties, and demonstrations against official UK facilities’.

    The papers are hugely embarrassing since they reveal that Gordon Brown’s government was in full agreement that Megrahi should be sent home.

    Former Justice Secretary Jack Straw has admitted that plans to include Megrahi in the agreement were made in part for commercial reasons.
    Oh dear... oh dear....

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Some good Aussie plain talking here

    BBC News - Wikileaks: Australia FM says US to blame, not Assange

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    I thought it was because he was terminally ill and only had a few weeks/months to live.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gonzo
    replied
    I thought that it was because he wasn't really guilty and his appeals were becoming a problem for the government.

    Releasing him put an end to the potential embarrassment.

    Leave a comment:


  • CheeseSlice
    replied
    Wasn't there a BP 'oil deal' at stake when this was in the papers last year?
    Again, we may be seeing a blur in who was being threatened here... is it the British people, or big businesses?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    It makes sense, quite believable.
    Nah, that's impossible.

    I mean the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Norther Ireland being scared of Libya?

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    It makes sense, quite believable.
    you know whats really weird ?

    my first thoughts were about wikileaks, the arrest today. the idea of the site. the web itself. Nothing at all about lockerbie.

    Its almost as if the web is taking over, its even becoming the story


    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    It makes sense, quite believable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    started a topic Why the Lockerbie Bomber was released

    Why the Lockerbie Bomber was released

    BBC News - Wikileaks: UK 'feared al-Megrahi jail death'

    The UK feared harsh action by Libya against British interests if the Lockerbie bomber died in jail, cables published by Wikileaks claim.

    The US cables say London's fully supported the release of Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi by the Scottish authorities.

Working...
X