• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Britain Freezes to death"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Has any of you lot got a fast breeder to work properly yet?

    I do find the sodium leaks so amusing.

    Fusion, naturally enough, is still 50 years away.

    Ho hum.

    Looks like I'll be stuck on this godforsaken rock for another millennium.

    I could walk home quicker.
    India seems to be leading the way with both fast breeder and thorium reactors, while everyone else is or has shut their fast breeders down, or they melted down on their own accord.
    Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Advanced Heavy Water Reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    It is in my case ...
    May the Outsource be with you!

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD View Post
    A good point sas, but I fear is it not the aristocracy nor the descendents of those privileged dynasties that are returning a percentage of their wealth in order to absolve their angst and post-empire guilt,
    It is in my case ...

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    To be fair that's a drop in the ocean compared to the billions we took off them over the centuries. Not for nothing did all the aristocracy go to India to "make their fortune".
    I sometimes think if we had been like Germany, who didn't have much of an empire and therefore a captive market, perhaps we'd be less lazy, have made better stuff and be more able to pay our way in the world now.
    A good point sas, but I fear is it not the aristocracy nor the descendents of those privileged dynasties that are returning a percentage of their wealth in order to absolve their angst and post-empire guilt, but the so called untermensch that are consistently beaten ever closer to the renowned poverty line that are being forced to pay this unnecessary tithe, encouragés by the constant verbal drumming and self-flagellation of our media and political elite?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
    How much did the Romans and the Danes take off us - where is our payment?



    I think the Germans tried to create one a bit back but others wouldn't allow it! There are lots of films about it anyway
    You hear that whooshing sound? That's the sound of points going straight over your head, that is.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    To be fair that's a drop in the ocean compared to the billions we took off them over the centuries. Not for nothing did all the aristocracy go to India to "make their fortune".
    How much did the Romans and the Danes take off us - where is our payment?

    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    I sometimes think if we had been like Germany, who didn't have much of an empire and therefore a captive market, perhaps we'd be less lazy, have made better stuff and be more able to pay our way in the world now.
    I think the Germans tried to create one a bit back but others wouldn't allow it! There are lots of films about it anyway

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD View Post
    Yes I changed it because I thought it was too much, but I quickly checked up and it's about a billion over 3 years...
    To be fair that's a drop in the ocean compared to the billions we took off them over the centuries. Not for nothing did all the aristocracy go to India to "make their fortune".
    I sometimes think if we had been like Germany, who didn't have much of an empire and therefore a captive market, perhaps we'd be less lazy, have made better stuff and be more able to pay our way in the world now.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    £8m? A good fraction of a £billion over a few years isn't it?
    Yes I changed it because I thought it was too much, but I quickly checked up and it's about a billion over 3 years...

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD View Post
    Agreed. Maybe the £8m we gave India might be better spent if we decided to follow the Thorium route instead of turning the country into a glorified hairdressing saloon.
    £8m? A good fraction of a £billion over a few years isn't it?

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    There's no demand for nuclear power stations in the UK. We've got more than enough weapons grade material.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Countries like India and China are putting fast breeder and Thorium reactors on-line currently, and if that comes off we will be laughing for hundreds or perhaps thousands of years. Except when it comes to buying Thorium off India maybe. I do hope our next generation of nuclear reactors will be of a type that can be easily converted to using Thorium.
    Agreed. Maybe the ~£1b we gave India might be better spent if we decided to follow the Thorium route instead of turning the country into a glorified hairdressing saloon.
    Last edited by hyperD; 6 December 2010, 15:51. Reason: Looked up true cost of donation

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Countries like India and China are putting fast breeder and Thorium reactors on-line currently, and if that comes off we will be laughing for hundreds or perhaps thousands of years. Except when it comes to buying Thorium off India maybe. I do hope our next generation of nuclear reactors will be of a type that can be easily converted to using Thorium.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Surely the turbines can be used to blow the cold weather back to Siberia.
    Only 20% of the time. The other 80% will have to be done by Combined Cycle Gas Turbines. Oh yes, and a load of your taxes.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Surely the turbines can be used to blow the cold weather back to Siberia.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    What about homeless people, or aren't they including in the mortality figures? They must be pretty tough, as I see them sitting on the cold pavement in -10 C weather. Where do they go at night?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X