• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Abu Ghraib New Photo's"

Collapse

  • davestewart
    replied
    http://www.apostrophe.fsnet.co.uk/

    Apparently they were going to kill off the apsotrophe, as it was just too confusing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harrysp
    replied
    Why do people do that I wonder

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru
    FFS The plural of photo is photos. No apostrophe.
    FFS Read "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" to supplement your crap educashun FFS.
    Does anyone know why people add an apostrophe to plurals? Anyone who does it, for example?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    FFS The plural of photo is photos. No apostrophe.
    FFS Read "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" to supplement your crap educashun FFS.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Stasi system does not provide an incentive to law enforcement to actually catch guilty people - they can take anybody and make them confess.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Black
    replied
    Do you think that's a better system then, the Stasi one I mean, i.e. by torturing people, rather than plea bargaining, did they manage to not only get the small guys to confess to crimes they hadn't committed but also catch some of the big guys who also hadn't committed anything?...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman
    Well, it's a pity the Stasi isn't still around.
    Plea bargain was applied as a matter of law by the US law enforcement in a bid to crack down on mafia top people - it was judged to be of decent compromise to let some pawn walk free if evidence that is achieved will allow to jail top figures in mafia. This is reasonable practice because otherwise pawns would just prefer to go to jail where they will get support for their silence.

    The difference with Stasi is that they were forcing people to confess in crimes they did not commit - they did not need any plea bargain process as torture will make people to falsely self-incriminate themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    Standard plea bargain - reduced punishment, possibly to zero if their cooperation will allow to catch bigger fish.
    Well, it's a pity the Stasi isn't still around.

    You'd be a brilliant candidate for their junior cadet ranks.

    They used to really like 'minds' like yours.
    Last edited by bogeyman; 15 February 2006, 20:38.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman
    What kind of 'incentive' would that have been then, exactly?
    Standard plea bargain - reduced punishment, possibly to zero if their cooperation will allow to catch bigger fish.

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    Surely those previously accused and convicted in the matter would have cooperated with the investigation if they were given enough incentive?
    What kind of 'incentive' would that have been then, exactly?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    The real question here is this: since photoes refer to the same period which was already investigated, then were people responsible for abuse on THESE photoes ALSO prosecuted, or they have managed to escape hand of law so far, if so, then why? Surely those previously accused and convicted in the matter would have cooperated with the investigation if they were given enough incentive?

    Leave a comment:


  • Harrysp
    started a topic Abu Ghraib New Photo's

    Abu Ghraib New Photo's

    The photographs and videos, which are currently the subject of a legal tug-of-war in America, where the Pentagon is fighting to prevent their publication

    http://smh.com.au/ftimages/2006/02/1...890773753.html

    plus more here

    http://today.reuters.com/tv/videoSto...18af6b6b3fd557
    Last edited by Harrysp; 16 February 2006, 10:36.

Working...
X