http://www.apostrophe.fsnet.co.uk/
Apparently they were going to kill off the apsotrophe, as it was just too confusing.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Abu Ghraib New Photo's
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Abu Ghraib New Photo's"
Collapse
-
Does anyone know why people add an apostrophe to plurals? Anyone who does it, for example?Originally posted by sasguruFFS The plural of photo is photos. No apostrophe.
FFS Read "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" to supplement your crap educashun FFS.
Leave a comment:
-
FFS The plural of photo is photos. No apostrophe.
FFS Read "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" to supplement your crap educashun FFS.
Leave a comment:
-
Stasi system does not provide an incentive to law enforcement to actually catch guilty people - they can take anybody and make them confess.
Leave a comment:
-
Do you think that's a better system then, the Stasi one I mean, i.e. by torturing people, rather than plea bargaining, did they manage to not only get the small guys to confess to crimes they hadn't committed but also catch some of the big guys who also hadn't committed anything?...
Leave a comment:
-
Plea bargain was applied as a matter of law by the US law enforcement in a bid to crack down on mafia top people - it was judged to be of decent compromise to let some pawn walk free if evidence that is achieved will allow to jail top figures in mafia. This is reasonable practice because otherwise pawns would just prefer to go to jail where they will get support for their silence.Originally posted by bogeymanWell, it's a pity the Stasi isn't still around.
The difference with Stasi is that they were forcing people to confess in crimes they did not commit - they did not need any plea bargain process as torture will make people to falsely self-incriminate themselves.
Leave a comment:
-
Well, it's a pity the Stasi isn't still around.Originally posted by AtWStandard plea bargain - reduced punishment, possibly to zero if their cooperation will allow to catch bigger fish.
You'd be a brilliant candidate for their junior cadet ranks.
They used to really like 'minds' like yours.Last edited by bogeyman; 15 February 2006, 20:38.
Leave a comment:
-
Standard plea bargain - reduced punishment, possibly to zero if their cooperation will allow to catch bigger fish.Originally posted by bogeymanWhat kind of 'incentive' would that have been then, exactly?
Leave a comment:
-
What kind of 'incentive' would that have been then, exactly?Originally posted by AtWSurely those previously accused and convicted in the matter would have cooperated with the investigation if they were given enough incentive?
Leave a comment:
-
The real question here is this: since photoes refer to the same period which was already investigated, then were people responsible for abuse on THESE photoes ALSO prosecuted, or they have managed to escape hand of law so far, if so, then why? Surely those previously accused and convicted in the matter would have cooperated with the investigation if they were given enough incentive?
Leave a comment:
-
Abu Ghraib New Photo's
The photographs and videos, which are currently the subject of a legal tug-of-war in America, where the Pentagon is fighting to prevent their publication
http://smh.com.au/ftimages/2006/02/1...890773753.html
plus more here
http://today.reuters.com/tv/videoSto...18af6b6b3fd557Last edited by Harrysp; 16 February 2006, 10:36.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Today 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Yesterday 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21

Leave a comment: