- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Why no arrests ?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Why no arrests ?"
Collapse
-
With your own urine?Originally posted by zeitghostowness == onus...
Sorry to be late, I've been etching PCBs...
Leave a comment:
-
Well there has been an arrest...but that was because the convicted druggie made it easy for the police to put him away (since he broke his parole conditions)
There will be no further arrests...mark my words!
Mailman
Leave a comment:
-
OnusOriginally posted by BobTheCrateWell spotted eternalnomad.
No there haven't been any arrests as far as I can tell.
The police statement immediately after the demos about not wanting to add to a tinderbox were rational. However the owness was and still is on them to make good their assurance that arrests would follow once calm resumed.
The politicised Police are getting the nack of spin. Did they ever have any intention of enforcing the law. That remains to be seen.
or Anus if you prefer.
damn beat me to it RWLast edited by sasguru; 15 February 2006, 13:25.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BobTheCrateHowever the owness was and still is on them to make good their assurance that arrests would follow once calm resumed.
It's either onus or own arse, one of the two...
Leave a comment:
-
As the police said at the time, enforcing the law is in fact one of their secondary duties. Preventing a breach of the peace was the primary consideration on the day, hence the arrest of two journalists who had a copy of the cartoons and a van driver who stopped to ask the police why they weren't arresting any of the demonstrators.
It's only fair you know.
P.S.
I'm pleased to see that my hypno-ray satellite is having its desired effect in my attempt to take control of your world. You only have to go over to the Accounting forum to see for yourself. It's carnage in there.
Leave a comment:
-
Well spotted eternalnomad.
No there haven't been any arrests as far as I can tell.
The police statement immediately after the demos about not wanting to add to a tinderbox were rational. However the owness was and still is on them to make good their assurance that arrests would follow once calm resumed.
The politicised Police are getting the nack of spin. Did they ever have any intention of enforcing the law. That remains to be seen.
Leave a comment:
-
I was even bemused to see that the parliamentary committee looking into the problems supermarkets, such as Tescos, were causing, spent quite a bit of time discussing how these chains are creating problems for minorities who wish to buy food not up to the UK's minimal food standard laws.
Un-freakin-believable.
Leave a comment:
-
No - they're all too busy pandering to the minority...
Minority rights rool - join one today!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Why no arrests ?
Have I missed something in the news these past few days ?
I have heard no reports of any arrests of those "mad muslims" who committed various crimes including incitement to murder.
Are the politicians and media hoping we have all forgotten ?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Today 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Yesterday 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31

Leave a comment: