Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
In the UK they will be applying the same questions to applicants for residence. Entry will be denied to anyone who answers "behead him/her/them" to more than 75% of the questions.
Well, their intentions are good but how are they going to implement it? UK already has all the legislation which is mentioned in this article, but does it work?
In the UK they will be applying the same questions to applicants for residence. Entry will be denied to anyone who answers "behead him/her/them" to more than 75% of the questions.
Still quite below then. Not so sure that going to France is the right move if you hope to find less immigration. Beware, they are even more posh for the accent and they will pretend they don't understand your french 'cos your accent is different (they can even behave worse than English from this point of view ).
that was 7% in 2001 - methinks it will have increased substantially since then.
Our "open door" policy hasnt worked and one day will come back to haunt the citizens of this country.
Its not so much that this country has an open door policy but more that this country doesnt screen those who come here from the less desireable parts of the world (like Pakistan, crapbluckistan, Australia etc).
When I moved here the rings and hoops we had to jump through were a joke...yet...had we been radical islamic militants seeking asylum we would have been given a house, massive government benefits and immediate permanent residency! Seems to be they are letting the wrong group of people in (since us law abiding, economically productive kiwis are a real catch for this country )
Of course the downside of Frances move is that all the scum that would have gone to France will now end up here!
Immigrants accounted for 7% of the total population in August 2001
Still quite below then. Not so sure that going to France is the right move if you hope to find less immigration. Beware, they are even more posh for the accent and they will pretend they don't understand your french 'cos your accent is different (they can even behave worse than English from this point of view ).
Well the French are pretty good at ensuring that rules are adhered to (when they want to), for example the case of the headscarf ban in France.
Can you imagine what would happen in this country if pupils were sent to headmaster/headmistress for arriving in school wearing religious clothing?
Well, their intentions are good but how are they going to implement it? UK already has all the legislation which is mentioned in this article, but does it work?
Well the French are pretty good at ensuring that rules are adhered to (when they want to), for example the case of the headscarf ban in France.
Can you imagine what would happen in this country if pupils were sent to headmaster/headmistress for arriving in school wearing religious clothing?
Leave a comment: