• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Child Benefit cuts could be unenforceable"

Collapse

  • MaryPoppins
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    Aye, if it's going, claim it. Nobody should ever refrain from claiming anything they are able to get away with. They have no problem demanding money from you with the threat of violence if you don't comply so don't feel guilty for having some of it back.

    This whole thing is a major clusterfrack. I think the plan was for it to be a preemptive strike. If they had not done anything then the left would go about moaning about 'the rich' getting child benefit. Now the whole plan is falling apart.
    I think I'm going to.

    I wonder if it might be a case of "ooh it's too difficult to sort out, let's just entirely abolish CB altogether".

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Zippy View Post
    Claim CB now Mary. You pay for it via your taxes. And also make sure you get nursery vouchers etc.
    Aye, if it's going, claim it. Nobody should ever refrain from claiming anything they are able to get away with. They have no problem demanding money from you with the threat of violence if you don't comply so don't feel guilty for having some of it back.

    This whole thing is a major clusterfrack. I think the plan was for it to be a preemptive strike. If they had not done anything then the left would go about moaning about 'the rich' getting child benefit. Now the whole plan is falling apart.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
    The problem being: How can the government easily prove the connection between mothers who are not themselves higher-rate taxpayers and the higher-rate taxpayers they might live with? It’s easier to stop the mother getting the benefit if she herself is a higher-rate taxpayer. It could be done via her tax code. But if she’s not, how good will the government be at establishing whether she is living with a partner paying tax at 40%?

    Link

    How would I (as a non perm) KNOW I will always be in the higher rate tax bracket?

    I don't actually claim CB, because I didn't actually realise that it was a benefit for all, when my son was born.

    Seems this policy could cost more than it actually saves?

    Claim CB now Mary. You pay for it via your taxes. And also make sure you get nursery vouchers etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    I'm pretty sure the HMRC database has my address on it.

    Surely joining the addresses of CB claimants with the HMRC DB would be an easy place to start?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
    I don't actually claim CB, because I didn't actually realise that it was a benefit for all, when my son was born.
    DOH!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • MaryPoppins
    started a topic Child Benefit cuts could be unenforceable

    Child Benefit cuts could be unenforceable

    The problem being: How can the government easily prove the connection between mothers who are not themselves higher-rate taxpayers and the higher-rate taxpayers they might live with? It’s easier to stop the mother getting the benefit if she herself is a higher-rate taxpayer. It could be done via her tax code. But if she’s not, how good will the government be at establishing whether she is living with a partner paying tax at 40%?

    Link

    How would I (as a non perm) KNOW I will always be in the higher rate tax bracket?

    I don't actually claim CB, because I didn't actually realise that it was a benefit for all, when my son was born.

    Seems this policy could cost more than it actually saves?

Working...
X