Originally posted by SupremeSpod
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: HMS Ark Royal to be scrapped ASAP
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "HMS Ark Royal to be scrapped ASAP"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Postany extra protein is a bonus.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostWe had real problems with shipworm on that one, I can tell you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI know; while the Frogs are on strike, which seems to be every day other than a random, unannounced rainy tuesday afternoon in february, why not nip in, nick a couple of their ships and bring them back to the UK?
OK, the manuals will be in French, but I'm sure we can figure out a way round that.
Henry the Fifth would have managed it!
Leave a comment:
-
I know; while the Frogs are on strike, which seems to be every day other than a random, unannounced rainy tuesday afternoon in february, why not nip in, nick a couple of their ships and bring them back to the UK?
OK, the manuals will be in French, but I'm sure we can figure out a way round that.
Henry the Fifth would have managed it!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View PostFeck, I'm so old I remember the first Ark Royal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Ark_Royal_(1587)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostFeck I now feel old, I remember the last Ark Royal and I'm only 39.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Troll View Poststeam catapult is passe... latest yank carriers will use Electromagnetic gubbins to launch planes
Leave a comment:
-
Cost $4.5 billion ( £2.84 billion) each
General characteristics
Type: Aircraft carrier
Displacement: 100,000 to 104,600 long tons (100,000–106,300 t)[1]
Length: Overall: 1,092 feet (332.8 m)
Waterline: 1,040 feet (317.0 m)
Beam: Overall: 252 ft (76.8 m)
Waterline: 134 ft (40.8 m)
Draft: Maximum navigational: 37 ft (11.3 m)
Limit: 41 ft (12.5 m)
Propulsion: 2 × Westinghouse A4W nuclear reactors
4 × steam turbines
4 × shafts
260,000 shp (194 MW)
Speed: 30+ knots (56+ km/h; 35+ mph)
Range: Essentially unlimited distance; 20 years
Complement: Ship's company: 3,200
Air wing: 2,480
Sensors and
processing systems: AN/SPS-48E 3-D air search radar
AN/SPS-49(V)5 2-D air search radar
AN/SPQ-9B target acquisition radar
AN/SPN-46 air traffic control radars
AN/SPN-43C air traffic control radar
AN/SPN-41 landing aid radars
4 × Mk 91 NSSM guidance systems
4 × Mk 95 radars
Electronic warfare
and decoys: SLQ-32A(V)4 Countermeasures suite
SLQ-25A Nixie torpedo countermeasures
Armament: 16–24 × Sea Sparrow or NATO Sea Sparrow missiles
3 or 4 × Phalanx CIWSs or RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missiles
Armor: 2.5 in (64 mm) kevlar over vital spaces[2]
Aircraft carried: 85-90 fixed wing and helicopters[3]
& for £3.8 ($6.02) billion & rising we get two of
Class and type: Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carrier
Displacement: 65,600 metric tons (72,300 short tons) (full load)[2]
Length: 284 metres (932 ft)[2]
Beam: 39 metres (waterline)
73 metres overall[2]
Draught: 11 metres[3]
Decks: 16,000 square metres[2]
Speed: 25+ knots
Range: 10,000 nautical miles (18,520 km)
Capacity: 1,450
Complement: 600
Aircraft carried: 40 aircraft, including 36 F-35 Lightning II
MOD didn't want the nuclear propulsion due to the extra costs!!
Since we are having to import foreign workers to do the build why not just buy two Nimitz class ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostScaffolding and gaffa tape on one of 'em then.
Strong elastic band?
Btw, are these new carriers Nukes or Gas turbine?
Leave a comment:
-
The BBC has also learned that at least one of the new carriers will be redesigned so that it can deploy normal fighter aircraft that do not need a Harrier-style vertical lift capability.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostFeck I now feel old, I remember the last Ark Royal and I'm only 39.
Can you land a Tornado on a small aircraft carrier?
the Tornado is HTTP , home to Turin with Pasta
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostFeck I now feel old, I remember the last Ark Royal and I'm only 39.
Can you land a Tornado on a small aircraft carrier?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: