• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Worthless pound

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Worthless pound"

Collapse

  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    They cost more because you have to create a system to produce them and pay the retailers for them.

    The banks already had a system in place for pensions and other benefits to be paid electronically.
    The system in the US is already in the form of a electronic card.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Not So Wise View Post
    SDR's have steadily fallen out of use since the 80's and unless the US stops running a deficit they will remain so, so that's one dead end
    Sorry but that's not true. They were used heavily in the bailout. I think I may have posted this earlier in this thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    They ought to cost less overall than paying cash to buy food.

    They cost more because you have to create a system to produce them and pay the retailers for them.

    The banks already had a system in place for pensions and other benefits to be paid electronically.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    Food stamps are evil.
    They ought to cost less overall than paying cash to buy food.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Food stamps are evil. The are inefficient, encourages crime, and create a dependency culture.

    It also leads to idiotic things like: NY May Ban Buying Sugary Drinks with Food Stamps

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    That's much better than paying pensioner like £70 per week and leaving them on their own.
    meh, we can afford it

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    42 million on food stamps
    That's much better than paying pensioner like £70 per week and leaving them on their own.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Not So Wise View Post
    SDR's have steadily fallen out of use since the 80's and unless the US stops running a deficit they will remain so, so that's one dead end

    The amero, the idea of a currency union between the US, Canada and Mexico so beloved by right wing conspiracy theory nuts, which always ignores one basic fact, who would demand on being top dog in that partnership?

    For that reason above any other the other two would never go for it as they would basically be handing control of their economy’s to the US

    America would basically have to fall to a level of a 3rd world country before they would even consider entering a "partnership of equals" with those other countries (especially Mexico) and until they agreed to such the others would never agree to it

    After the fiasco over the last year or two with the euro zone countries doubt will even see academics talking about a global currency in theory for a decade or so, never mind anyone in power even thinking about trying to create it
    Uh huh. Read the papers lately? 42 million on food stamps, soaring unemployment and their currency collapsing around their ears. Their debt to GDP ratio is growing by around 1.6Trillion dollars annually and all they can do is raise the threshold of them defaulting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Not So Wise
    replied
    SDR's have steadily fallen out of use since the 80's and unless the US stops running a deficit they will remain so, so that's one dead end

    The amero, the idea of a currency union between the US, Canada and Mexico so beloved by right wing conspiracy theory nuts, which always ignores one basic fact, who would demand on being top dog in that partnership?

    For that reason above any other the other two would never go for it as they would basically be handing control of their economy’s to the US

    America would basically have to fall to a level of a 3rd world country before they would even consider entering a "partnership of equals" with those other countries (especially Mexico) and until they agreed to such the others would never agree to it

    After the fiasco over the last year or two with the euro zone countries doubt will even see academics talking about a global currency in theory for a decade or so, never mind anyone in power even thinking about trying to create it

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    No, I've answered why I don't believe it. You believe what you like, it's a pointless argument. It simply won't happen.
    It's an inevitable step on the way to the abolishment of money.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    No, I've answered why I don't believe it. You believe what you like, it's a pointless argument. It simply won't happen.
    No need to sulk.
    We need a "bottom lip out" smiley

    Edit :
    Last edited by suityou01; 7 October 2010, 15:10.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    No, I've answered why I don't believe it. You believe what you like, it's a pointless argument. It simply won't happen.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X