Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
well, after a clear message in early July that there will be no more extensions....
3 weeks before end of contract they come back and say, you can have 3 months on paper
and verbal that it will continue until easter next year
but
there has to be a rate cut
i told 'em stick their rate cut where the sun don't shine and also made it clear to the agency I do not
expect the agency to cut their margin - keep it all like it is and if they don't like it tough
anyway.....
agency caves in and cut's their margin but purchasing team are still not happy and wants more....
wants a minimum weekly utilisation of 25 hours per week
i tells the agency, tell 'em it's 28 hours or nothing
while waiting for the decision I hears from a colleague that he's just been in a meeting where pm's are discussing
my work load, cos they're worried there's gonna be so much I'll need someone working with me....
purchasing agrees to the 28 hours minimum utilisation
all's well that ends well
a great great lesson the whole exercise has been, because, if I had caved in on rate and then... been hit with dropping
the number of hours that would have been really bad
as it is, it's all fine
contracting eh, all good fun
benes family will have food on the table for a few months more
Milan.
Well done benesy. Word to the wise though, upgrade the wheels. They probably saw your rusting Passat and thought "This guy is a soft touch!"
well, after a clear message in early July that there will be no more extensions....
3 weeks before end of contract they come back and say, you can have 3 months on paper
and verbal that it will continue until easter next year
but
there has to be a rate cut
i told 'em stick their rate cut where the sun don't shine and also made it clear to the agency I do not
expect the agency to cut their margin - keep it all like it is and if they don't like it tough
anyway.....
agency caves in and cut's their margin but purchasing team are still not happy and wants more....
wants a minimum weekly utilisation of 25 hours per week
i tells the agency, tell 'em it's 28 hours or nothing
while waiting for the decision I hears from a colleague that he's just been in a meeting where pm's are discussing
my work load, cos they're worried there's gonna be so much I'll need someone working with me....
purchasing agrees to the 28 hours minimum utilisation
all's well that ends well
a great great lesson the whole exercise has been, because, if I had caved in on rate and then... been hit with dropping
the number of hours that would have been really bad
as it is, it's all fine
contracting eh, all good fun
benes family will have food on the table for a few months more
Leave a comment: