• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Would she have got away with calling her"

Collapse

  • Spacecadet
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Prosecuted for calling some a coconut? Whatever next? FFS.
    She should have been prosecuted for being an idiot for implying that providing handouts to ethnic minorities is an acceptable use of public money.
    WHS.

    Personally, I never knew 'coconut' was categorised as a racial slur.

    I'm presuming the word 'honky' also falls into this category - used to make me laugh when you used to see it used in late 70's/early 80's TV & movies like Starsky & Hutch or Magnum Force.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    What part of my statement don't you agree with? and why?
    I agree with you. I am simply agreeing in the fashion of my father reading the Daily Wail.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Tut. Tut. These people
    What part of my statement don't you agree with? and why?

    Leave a comment:


  • Drewster
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Ahh, right.

    Never knew that.

    I called Garth Crooks a cream egg the other day, I just though his head was the same shape as a cream egg now that he has put on about 10 stone.
    Not a Cream "egg and spoon" - I hope

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    I heard this on the News yesterday.

    I didn't know that it was an offensive term until it was explained.

    Btw, does this make Obama a coconut? Black(which is debatable) on the outside but white on the inside?
    Ahh, right.

    Never knew that.

    I called Garth Crooks a cream egg the other day, I just though his head was the same shape as a cream egg now that he has put on about 10 stone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Prosecuted for calling some a coconut? Whatever next? FFS.
    She should have been prosecuted for being an idiot for implying that providing handouts to ethnic minorities is an acceptable use of public money.
    Tut. Tut. These people

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I can't help thinking this would make it illegal to call someone a Tunnock's Tea Cake.
    If any of you call me a white chocolate coffee cream I'm reporting you.....


    But in todays world I'd be in trouble for being offended by being likened to a black man......

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Prosecuted for calling some a coconut? Whatever next? FFS.
    She should have been prosecuted for being an idiot for implying that providing handouts to ethnic minorities is an acceptable use of public money.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    I can't help thinking this would make it illegal to call someone a Tunnock's Tea Cake.

    Leave a comment:


  • Drewster
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    The recipient of the comment - Shirley?
    You are a really really nice guy!

    I bet you can't get a conviction!

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    Agreed in principle but how do you decide how to legislate it.
    By going to court and making case law.

    Section 5 of the Public Order Act is a pretty handy catch-all for the Police and CPS.

    Edit: Except Magistrates don't set precedent so unless an appeal to a higher court is rejected you can still call somebody a coconut and duke it out in court.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    Agreed in principle but how do you decide how to legislate it.
    That's just it, you can't and imo a third party shouldn't.

    I say go outside and duke it out.

    Simples.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    The recipient of the comment - Shirley?
    Agreed in principle but how do you decide how to legislate it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    She obviously had a crap barrister. Poor woman.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X