• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "John Terry apologises"

Collapse

  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    Foreign Player Percentages

    I know it's from 2006-2007 but it shows England at 59% and Germany at 50% so not that different.

    I don't fully understand why but all the top managers complain that English players are too expensive when asked why they buy foreigners.

    I think you are right when you say there are too many foreign players but they do bring benefits to the domestic leagues, if the Premiership wasn't such a spectacle you'd see more home grown talent playing abroad.
    Freedom of movement of labour within the EU. Players go where the money is, which is why we've got more foreign players at the moment.

    If Sky switched their attentions and money from the Premiership to the Bundesliga or La Liga, there will be some migration over to there.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Well, you are not as bad as France.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    He moves to 4999.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    Foreign Player Percentages

    I know it's from 2006-2007 but it shows England at 59% and Germany at 50% so not that different.

    I don't fully understand why but all the top managers complain that English players are too expensive when asked why they buy foreigners.

    I think you are right when you say there are too many foreign players but they do bring benefits to the domestic leagues, if the Premiership wasn't such a spectacle you'd see more home grown talent playing abroad.
    Maybe it was starts rather than registered players, I am looking at the Bayern squad and I count 13 german players. I look at the Chelsea which is a far bigger squad and I see 10 English players. Arsenal and I see 4 English players. Man United have a dozen but are we really asking England to play Joe Dudgeon or Oliver Norwood.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I heard some stat about how the Premiership only use 30% of their players from England and you have never had a history of exporting players. So really you are utilizing only about 15 million people of your population as a footballing resource. Compare that to Germany with a population of 80 million who must play 70% home grown players in their leagues then you are always going to have a 1/4 of the players they have.

    If you want to have a national team then you have to stop importing players.
    Foreign Player Percentages

    I know it's from 2006-2007 but it shows England at 59% and Germany at 50% so not that different.

    I don't fully understand why but all the top managers complain that English players are too expensive when asked why they buy foreigners.

    I think you are right when you say there are too many foreign players but they do bring benefits to the domestic leagues, if the Premiership wasn't such a spectacle you'd see more home grown talent playing abroad.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    I heard some stat about how the Premiership only use 30% of their players from England and you have never had a history of exporting players. So really you are utilizing only about 15 million people of your population as a footballing resource. Compare that to Germany with a population of 80 million who must play 70% home grown players in their leagues then you are always going to have a 1/4 of the players they have.

    If you want to have a national team then you have to stop importing players.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Indeed it is time we stopped thinking England is a contender for top honours on the world stage - by encouraging our so-called "stars" with delusions that they are world-class, we stoke their already over-inflated egos.
    Fact is that some of England's players are good but not good enough.
    Quarter finals is not, as some think, a failure, but actually a reasonable level for a team ranked 8 in the world.
    Did Italy deserve to win the last world cup? Football isn't a definable spread sheet, sometimes guile and determination wins the day.

    Granted we haven't seen any sign of that yet but we also haven't seen the sort of petulance the French side have shown either.

    Judge the England team on their next performance.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Indeed it is time we stopped thinking England is a contender for top honours on the world stage - by encouraging our so-called "stars" with delusions that they are world-class, we stoke their already over-inflated egos.
    Fact is that some of England's players are good but not good enough.
    Quarter finals is not, as some think, a failure, but actually a reasonable level for a team ranked 8 in the world.
    What the media in this country should do, if they REALLY wanted to help, is slate them consistently for the next 2 years. That way, by the time the next Euro Finals came around, they might be champing at the bit to prove them wrong, instead of turning up expecting it to be a stroll in the park. Fat chance of that happening mind you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by FiveTimes View Post
    The bit about Munich is harsh.
    Yeah, you could be right. However it would give them chance to start with a clean slate.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by FiveTimes View Post
    Would he get into a World XI - no chance, but on the performances this WC no one from the England team would.
    Indeed it is time we stopped thinking England is a contender for top honours on the world stage - by encouraging our so-called "stars" with delusions that they are world-class, we stoke their already over-inflated egos.
    Fact is that some of England's players are good but not good enough.
    Quarter finals is not, as some think, a failure, but actually a reasonable level for a team ranked 8 in the world.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Terry is a world class defender, you do not get to play in that position for a team that has just won the premiership if you are crap. But he is not in the top level of world class defenders, he is a total cock and what he has done is very damaging to the team he has aspirations to lead again.
    That is what I was getting at.
    And yes the man is a total tool - his actions have damaged the team, how could they not?

    Leave a comment:


  • FiveTimes
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Those overpaid useless bastards are taking the place of someone who want to play for their country.

    I wonder if their plane will come home via Munich...
    The bit about Munich is harsh.

    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Would you say Terry is a world class defender then?
    No he isn't "World Class" but he is "Country Class" (one of the best in the country).

    Would he get into a World XI - no chance, but on the performances this WC no one from the England team would.
    Last edited by FiveTimes; 22 June 2010, 12:31.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Terry is a world class defender, you do not get to play in that position for a team that has just won the premiership if you are crap. But he is not in the top level of world class defenders, he is a total cock and what he has done is very damaging to the team he has aspirations to lead again.
    Last edited by minestrone; 22 June 2010, 12:32.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Would you say Terry is a world class defender then?

    Yes, he plays for his country on the world stage ergo he is 'world class' compared to the domestic players who do not.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Care to present any facts? Seems strange Chelsea, who won the league and have money to buy who they want, are happy with only 'competent' players. Look at the Chelsea team who did so well - few of their big players have done well at the world cup... Joe Cole, Ashley Cole, Terry, Drogba, Malouda, Anelka, etc.
    Would you say Terry is a world class defender then?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X