Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Budget expectations
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Budget expectations"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by MrMark View PostHere's one commentator who believes the coming cuts will harm the country severely
There is no logic to the brutish cuts that George Osborne is proposing | Will Huton | Comment is free | The Observer
Do the Tories get the parlous financial situation the country is in with it's £903 billion of public debt, he asks.
If we don't make serious cuts we will lose our triple A rating our interest bill will go up and we will be in a world of pain.
So far Liam has been on the money.
Will Huton has been mostly wrong with his pseudo left wing economics ...
Leave a comment:
-
Here's one commentator who believes the coming cuts will harm the country severely
There is no logic to the brutish cuts that George Osborne is proposing | Will Huton | Comment is free | The Observer
The former Labour government had already committed to a greater and faster reduction in the budget deficit than any British government in modern times. The coalition government wants to do more; to nearly eliminate a structural budget deficit of 8% of national output – some £116bn – in five years. Moreover, it wants spending cuts to take 80% of the load. No country has ever volunteered such austerity. It is as tough a package of retrenchment as the IMF imposed on Greece, a country on the brink of bankruptcy. It is twice as tough as the famously harsh measures Canada took between 1994 and 1997. It is three times tougher than Sweden's measures between 1993 and 1995. In British terms, it is immeasurably tougher than what we did after the IMF crisis in 1976 or after the ERM crisis in 1992.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostA year after it starts it will be rare to find any companies that qualify or have managed to benefit from the scheme.
Another memory from that era - a fellow contractor with his own software house (4-5 employees) decided to give a YOPS lad or lass a chance. The first thing that happened was a visit from some Elf'n'Safety type assessing his premises to see if they were suitable for an employee. At least two billable days lost and lots of red tape later, he was beginning to wish he hadn't bothered.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostSounds like something right out of nuLieBore's playbook - announce something to capture the headlines, but in practise does not exist.
A year after it starts it will be rare to find any companies that qualify or have managed to benefit from the scheme.
We need it up here ...
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds like something right out of nuLieBore's playbook - announce something to capture the headlines, but in practise does not exist.
A year after it starts it will be rare to find any companies that qualify or have managed to benefit from the scheme.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sysman View PostDepending on how it is implemented this could be a good move. Right from the start they mentioned moving the emphasis off the South East, which after 30 years of centralisation there could be a Good Thing.
The devil will be in the detail of course.
take advantage of....
Leave a comment:
-
Depending on how it is implemented this could be a good move. Right from the start they mentioned moving the emphasis off the South East, which after 30 years of centralisation there could be a Good Thing.
The devil will be in the detail of course.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrMark View PostWell it doesn't seem too bizarre to me, rather an attempt to improve employment outside of the economic heartland. The problem is, how do you define "the South East". Places like Dorset, Hampshire or Northamptonshire may benefit I suppose. The real hard-hit wastelands like Middlesbrough or Liverpool? Still, be interesting to see how this attempt to "buck the market" pans out.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by moorfield View PostExactly what I was thinking. It seems a bizarre idea to me.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Yesterday 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
Leave a comment: