Originally posted by TimberWolf
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: 'Special' relationship back on
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "'Special' relationship back on"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostI know that FFS, look at what TimberCub posted:
""
I exactly opposed his view that Cameron is a newly elected leader - he isn't elected like Obama to lead, it just so happens he is head of the party that people voted for.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostThere are maybe 10-15% swing vote that they need to get in UK and maybe 5% in the USA and that's what it is all about.
My experience with politics goes much deeper than you think
What percentage of those 10-15% vote based it on personality (of the leaders) and what percentage on policy or both? I would normally vote Tory (core), Cleggs honesty (personality) was slightly more appealing than Cameron's, but Cleggs policies were less appealing. So personality and policy were factors in my decision making. I didn't vote.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostI exactly opposed his view that Cameron is a newly elected leader - he isn't elected like Obama to lead, it just so happens he is head of the party that people voted for.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostCameron, or any other Prime Minister is not our 'leader'. This is a monarchy.
"Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostHmm. Does he say that to all new elected leaders?
I exactly opposed his view that Cameron is a newly elected leader - he isn't elected like Obama to lead, it just so happens he is head of the party that people voted for.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostI am well aware of that, thank you.
Like I said Obama was directly elected to lead his country - Cameron will lead the country by proxy - people voted for Conservative party and he had to make a deal to actually get into #10. Pretty much anybody in his position would have gotten in - even Brown, compare this system with fight OBama had to put up with and it's clear they are totally incomparable.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostIf people vote for a particular party why do you think politicians bother with expensive election campaigns?
My experience with politics goes much deeper than you think
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post1. We have a parliamentary system, not a presidential one.
2. The PM is head of government and not head of State. These are separate entities in most countries, but not in the US.
Like I said Obama was directly elected to lead his country - Cameron will lead the country by proxy - people voted for Conservative party and he had to make a deal to actually get into #10. Pretty much anybody in his position would have gotten in - even Brown, compare this system with fight OBama had to put up with and it's clear they are totally incomparable.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostBollox - most people vote for a party, not particular leader - there are some notable exceptions in history but UK politics aint one of them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostObama was elected directly to be leader of his country, Cameron wasn't.
1. We have a parliamentary system, not a presidential one.
2. The PM is head of government and not head of State. These are separate entities in most countries, but not in the US.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostNot directly perhaps, but IMO people do vote for party leaders here as well as for parties and policies.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostObama was elected directly to be leader of his country, Cameron wasn't.
Leave a comment:
-
'Special' relationship back on
Obama invites UK's Cameron to Washington
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama said on Tuesday he told new British Prime Minister David Cameron he remained committed to a "special relationship" between their countries and invited him to visit Washington this summer.
"The United States has no closer friend and ally than the United Kingdom, and I reiterated my deep and personal commitment to the special relationship between our two countries -- a bond that has endured for generations and across party lines, and that is essential to the security and prosperity of our two countries and the world," Obama said in a statement after calling Cameron to congratulate him.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: