Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
We contractors have been informed that the organisation were we are performing services will no longer be paying for contractors to attend courses. Why they were paying in the first place is a bit of a mystery to me.
Now I've only ever not paid for one course in the last fifteen years of contracting and the one course that was paid for me I did not think very much of anyway.
Bob must be wetting himself with all the new business he is about to get.
I think you may find that wholesale projects will be cut (ID cards - Lib Dems hate them) rather than expending valuable time and money on consultants trying to cut costs. That said other projects will probably get just that
Maybe he should start by shutting down the DTI (Department of Trade & Industry), which is only kept on to give a cabinet minister a portfolio.
Then throw the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) overboard, and go back to using police solicitors. That would save a fortune.
Reverse all this supreme court nonsense, and sell off the building, and go back to having a judicial committee in the House of Lords.
Then close all these registers that have been sprouting like weeds. (It's not just the Sex Offender's register - I think there are several now, which could all be dealt with by the CRB).
There must be dozens of other quangos and outfits that have accumulated since the 1980s, or even 1997. So why not ditch the lot?
Leave a comment: