The way forward

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

HairyArsedBloke replied

8 May 2010, 10:40
How about the transferable vote system where you give first, second, etc choices?

You could try it out in a few Labour areas. In middle class ones they would vote 1. Green, 2. Labour and in working class ones they would vote 1. BNP, 2. Labour. In Muslim areas the local Imam would vote for every one as 1. Islamic revolutionary party, 2. Labour.

I actually like the transferable vote system, but I know that it would cause totally mayhem; which I like too. However, that is another good reason to cut the size of government and it's activities so it can cause less damage.
Leave a comment:
MrMark replied

8 May 2010, 10:33
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post

If I were a Tory strategist looking to cosy up to the LibDems, my number one piece of advice would be as follows. I'd suggest that PR be trialled for a period of let's say oh....50 years, on a regional basis. Starting with the 2 devolved areas, Scotland and Wales. If successful () it could then be rolled out slowly across the north of England and then into urban areas so that the seating plan in the House of Commons far better represents the views of the Electorate as a whole. What do the panel think?

Not bad, although I suspect the Lib Dems would reject this.

Can't see why Dave doesn't just say "yes you can have a referendum on PR, but I'll campaign against the Yes vote". In the meantime he gets to govern, and has the chance to choose a favourable time to have another election over the next year or so - it's a distinct possibility Labour will have a civil war over the replacement leader and thus fade even more at the next election. A lot more Lib Dem support will fade away too, as many of their supporters will think "what's the point?". Why is Dave dithering over this? Has he caught Brown's syndrome?
Leave a comment:
shaunbhoy started a topic The way forward

8 May 2010, 10:04
The way forward

If I were a Tory strategist looking to cosy up to the LibDems, my number one piece of advice would be as follows. I'd suggest that PR be trialled for a period of let's say oh....50 years, on a regional basis. Starting with the 2 devolved areas, Scotland and Wales. If successful () it could then be rolled out slowly across the north of England and then into urban areas so that the seating plan in the House of Commons far better represents the views of the Electorate as a whole. What do the panel think?
Tags: None