Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Can we believe anything we are told in the press?"
Germany has a massive advantage with its location, the marshal plan gave mountains of money after the war to restoring their factories as they recognised that Europe relied upon a strong Germany in the middle coordinating the continent's manufacturing efforts. Although we got about 3 times as much money from the yanks we spent it all on the new NHS and social housing.
The Allies also drew-up a constitution whereby workers were represented on company boards. The hope was that it would slow down manufacturing completion. It turned out to be complete opposite. The ideas from the workers increased productivity.
I find that most problems with British companies is that that management arte clueless and arrogant.
Of all the MP's currently in the British parliament only one is a scientist. No engineers. All are lawyers or holding degrees in politics. The scientific / engineering community is massively underrepresented and only highlights the floccinaucinihilipilification with which UK politicians regard this community. There is no interest in longterm planning.
Now Chancellor Merkel has a doctorate in physical chemistry, her closest advisers are physicists and engineers. One of my German clients has me working on a task who's sole aim is to ensure the reliability of product development over a 30 year period. My goodness, never have I had a client with such longterm thinking.
blah And the chief economist of HSBC, one of the few to predict the downturn has just wriiten a book based on evidence from the data (not opinion) which suggests thats globalisation is bad for the UK, as service jobs are haemorraging to the East with very little benefit to the country as a whole, as opposed to short term gain for some corps.Blah
really noo so you mean that CEO's of corps will look at short term financial gain over long term benefits to the country...
Germany has a massive advantage with its location, the marshal plan gave mountains of money after the war to restoring their factories as they recognised that Europe relied upon a strong Germany in the middle coordinating the continent's manufacturing efforts. Although we got about 3 times as much money from the yanks we spent it all on the new NHS and social housing.
For years we have been told that "socialist" Europe is "sclerotic" as opposed to the dynamic Anglo-Saxon economies.
Yet the latest Newsweek(an American mag) tells us how much better Europe (not UK) is emerging from the recession. ...
Newsweek has a notoriously left-wing liberal socialist bias, and in this case they're talking utter bollox.
Germany may be doing OK, but what about Greece, Spain, Italy, and even France?
Leave a comment: