• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "1 in 5 people of working age is economically inactive - worst figure since 1971"

Collapse

  • minestrone
    replied
    Don't worry, the 'fit note' will sort that all out.

    ( where the hell is the roll eyes smilie? )

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    People often say such things as if the public sector are parasites. They are not, they are our employees, there to do things that we want done. Whether there are too many of them, or they are doing the wrong things, are other questions, not in the least answered this way.

    Might as well say that the office canteen staff are supported by the rest: in a sense they are, but that is not a reason to get rid of them.
    Not what I said. The fact is that they do have to be supported by the rest of us, and there is surely a limit on the percentage "the earners" can support.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    Add another ~18% working for the state - see this thread from yesterday

    so, nearly 40% are supported by the rest.
    People often say such things as if the public sector are parasites. They are not, they are our employees, there to do things that we want done. Whether there are too many of them, or they are doing the wrong things, are other questions, not in the least answered this way.

    Might as well say that the office canteen staff are supported by the rest: in a sense they are, but that is not a reason to get rid of them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Add another ~18% working for the state - see this thread from yesterday

    so, nearly 40% are supported by the rest.

    Leave a comment:


  • 1 in 5 people of working age is economically inactive - worst figure since 1971

    Full report here:

    Jobless total hits 16-year high - Yahoo! News UK

    So 20% of people who would otherwise work are not working.
    If the remaining 80% in work improved productivity to German levels, perhaps another 10-20% people would not be needed.

    So that shows you roughly how big the UK economic pie is - rougly enough to support only 60-70% of the population by a rough estimate.

Working...
X