Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Religious belief in terminal decline in the UK"
"There's no proper evidence" sounds like something Chico would have said (or, indeed, did say in that other thread), even after having been given evidence. Ironic really for someone who considers an interesting collection of folk tales to be "proper evidence".
Very true Spartacus. If you missed my other thread posted today about "Godless Societies" that's even more interesting. It has caused such a rumpus in the US even though most statisticians supported the methodology.
After that the loony Christians started ad-hominem attacks on the researcher.
"There is an assumption that people 'catch' religion from their parents, but many people come to faith through the grandparents, schools, and their friends," said Steve Jenkins, a spokesman. He said that the study had not released "proper evidence".
"There's no proper evidence" sounds like something Chico would have said (or, indeed, did say in that other thread), even after having been given evidence. Ironic really for someone who considers an interesting collection of folk tales to be "proper evidence".
This sounds remarkably like "Common Law" which as I understand it is the basis of English Law and has its foundation in precedent?
You are quite correct. However, the problem with case law is interpretation and predictability (or lack of). Good statute is disambiguous and offers more predictability - which is good for business. Therefore most jurisdictions have a mix of both.
Perhaps we can look forward to a society made up of grey areas based on 'reasonableness' and trade-offs? How will codify this into law? If it can't be written then how do we guarantee consistency?
This sounds remarkably like "Common Law" which as I understand it is the basis of English Law and has its foundation in precedent?
Can anyone suggest what will shape our moral code (and hence legal code) in the absence of religious belief?
Perhaps we can look forward to a society made up of grey areas based on 'reasonableness' and trade-offs? How will codify this into law? If it can't be written then how do we guarantee consistency?
Leave a comment: