• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Labour's favourite stealth tax"

Collapse

  • centurian
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    I don't know which is worse: that politicians think that most people will fall for it, or that they are probably right.
    Each week on Question Time, either a member of the audience, or a non-politician member of the panel says something like "the public don't want to be treated like idiots - tell us the truth", which usually garners raptuous applause.

    The problem is that I think the public do want to be treated like idiots. They want to be told what they want to hear. That's why the "Labour investment vs Tory cuts" (and subsequent messages) has been so effective. Everyone knows it's utter claptrap, but they'll vote for it on the 0.001% chance that they might be correct, because thats better than voting for someone that is promising to make cuts.

    "I want the truth" - "You can't handle the truth"
    A Few Good Men
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j2F4...eature=related

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    I had assumed that most employers didn't ever put that element on the payslips, but I'd be happy to be corrected on that assumption.
    The only payslips I've ever had with Employers NI on were when I was with an umbrella company a few years ago, and this was presumably so I could tally up the gross figure with what was invoiced.

    My wife's most recent payslips didn't include this but I guess it may vary from company to company.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Most pay slips to include employers NI. Most employees don't give a tulip if they are 'expensive' to hire.
    Admittedly I've not had a non contractors payslip in almost 20 years, but I did help a friend sort out a question with their pay a couple of weeks ago and his payslips didn't mention the employers NI. I'm pretty certain of that.

    I had assumed that most employers didn't ever put that element on the payslips, but I'd be happy to be corrected on that assumption.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
    Also, employees don't see Employers NIC on their payslips, and probably assume it doesn't affect them.
    Most pay slips to include employers NI. Most employees don't give a tulip if they are 'expensive' to hire.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Wikir Man
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMark View Post
    If their lips are moving they're probably lying.
    Read my lips - no new taxes.

    Apart from the fact that George H.W. Bush wasn't talking out of his lips.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    I don't know which is worse: that politicians think that most people will fall for it, or that they are probably right.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMark View Post
    I think this started under Maggie's rule. The Tories reduced the basic rate of income tax, but the rise in national insurance (presumably to pay for the extra 3 million unemployed) pretty much wiped out any savings. I also remember the Tories claiming they wouldn't double VAT... End of the day you have to remember you're dealing with politicians. If their lips are moving they're invariably lying.
    FTFY...

    Your memory is correct this particular piece of bait and switch taxation fiddling started with the Thatcher era and has been happily carried on ever since.
    I find it very amusing that people are still taken in by the myth that NI is in some way not an income tax. It's a big fat revenue stream that most people ignore when income taxes are mentioned in the press.

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    The reason is that the headline rate of tax (i.e. the standard rate) is the only one which seems to count politically nowadays.
    Labour recognised this in 97 this which is why they were only too willing to promise not to increase it.

    Also, employees don't see Employers NIC on their payslips, and probably assume it doesn't affect them.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMark
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    The reason is that the headline rate of tax (i.e. the standard rate) is the only one which seems to count politically nowadays.
    I think this started under Maggie's rule. The Tories reduced the basic rate of income tax, but the rise in national insurance (presumably to pay for the extra 3 million unemployed) pretty much wiped out any savings. I also remember the Tories claiming they wouldn't double VAT... End of the day you have to remember you're dealing with politicians. If their lips are moving they're probably lying.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    The reason is that the headline rate of tax (i.e. the standard rate) is the only one which seems to count politically nowadays.

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    started a topic Labour's favourite stealth tax

    Labour's favourite stealth tax

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8602988.stm

    Calling it Labour's "favourite stealth tax", the Tories say they have calculated that the revenue the Treasury received from NI had risen by 22% in real terms since 2001-02 - five times the growth in income tax receipts over the same period.

    Previously, I had only calculated it at 2x, but I hadn't taken into account inflation.

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...insurance.html

Working...
X