Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
if he's selling all the tulipe that he bought in the past why should he pay tax on it ?
at first principle he is converting tulipe into cash,
if it's to be taxed he may as well barter and swap everything
He only pays tax on it (CGT) if sells it for more than he bought it for and then only if the total sales exceeds the CGT threshold for the year (about £8k-ish).
Of course, if he is deemed to be a trader, then he has to pay income tax on it.
"Someone who amasses a collection of X and sells it some years later when he's lost interest is not a trader. He may have to pay CGT if the gain is big enough, but definitely not income tax.",
if he's selling all the tulipe that he bought in the past why should he pay tax on it ?
at first principle he is converting tulipe into cash,
if it's to be taxed he may as well barter and swap everything
eureka....
perhaps an idea for a new ebay, barterbay, where people swap and barter things no cash changes hands
Milan.
However, in the UK anyway, you would be taxed on 'deemed' profit.
after all, it's only 'fair'.
"Someone who amasses a collection of X and sells it some years later when he's lost interest is not a trader. He may have to pay CGT if the gain is big enough, but definitely not income tax.",
if he's selling all the tulipe that he bought in the past why should he pay tax on it ?
at first principle he is converting tulipe into cash,
if it's to be taxed he may as well barter and swap everything
eureka....
perhaps an idea for a new ebay, barterbay, where people swap and barter things no cash changes hands
You might be right, IR35 Avoider. This was a few months ago and things may have been clarified since then. The inspector said it was a matter of "sensible judgement" by the investigator (great, huh, nothing objective set down in law or anything useful like that).
I vaguely recall the item about the man clearing his attic.
I think Hector was wrong in his case. It takes more than selling a lot of stuff to be a trader. Someone who amasses a collection of X and sells it some years later when he's lost interest is not a trader. He may have to pay CGT if the gain is big enough, but definitely not income tax.
As someone has pointed out, it's a different matter if you buy things with the intention of reselling them. Then I'd say you are trading even if you only ever buy/sell one item.
Last edited by IR35 Avoider; 6 January 2006, 13:44.
This programme was specifically concentrating on the eBay angle. The inspector said they had set up a dedicated eBay unit and reckoned that most eBayers with ratings of 1000+ would come under scrutiny sooner or later. He also said these were usually the reasons they classify someone as a trader:
1. Buying one or more items specifically with the objective of selling them profitably (pretty self evident and fair enough).
2. Selling multiple similar items (Dinky toys in this guy's case).
3. Shifting a lot of high value stuff (even if it was your stuff in the first place).
He gave the impression that it really did come down to whether there was potentially significant tax at stake. After all, as he said more than once, it's only "fair".
Sure does. Heard an interview with a tax inspector a couple of months ago on Moneybox. They had recently classified a guy clearing his own loft on eBay as a trader!! In his case that was due to a large number of relatively valuable Dinky toys he was shifting!
I'm not convinced selling cars on ebay is a good business for an amateur.
I think a professional Ebay dealer is more accountable than a normal second-hand dealer for anything he sells and will almost always have to take back a car or cancel a trade if the customer is dissatisfied. This means they have to have real confidence in what they are selling.
On the other hand, an amateur selling on Ebay is likely to be perceived as such, i.e. as someone who won't go as far to protect his reputation, and this will be reflected in the prices he gets.
Well if you are a trader you have obligations a private seller doesn't. I'm just thinking of selling a few privately, and certainly not looking to con people (as many ebay traders are).
I'm not convinced selling cars on ebay is a good business for an amateur.
I think a professional Ebay dealer is more accountable than a normal second-hand dealer for anything he sells and will almost always have to take back a car or cancel a trade if the customer is dissatisfied. This means they have to have real confidence in what they are selling.
On the other hand, an amateur selling on Ebay is likely to be perceived as such, i.e. as someone who won't go as far to protect his reputation, and this will be reflected in the prices he gets.
Leave a comment: