Instead of "raising money" to cut the deficit, how about massively reducing the deficit by spending a lot less by targeting what you do spend wisely and by cutting out all the quangoes and diversity outreach consultants, and having 200,000 interpreters on call to deal with the immigrants from every nation in the world rather than expecting them to learn English etc.
Labour, **** off with your new ways to tax and spend.
HTH
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Nu Liebor MP questionnaire
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Nu Liebor MP questionnaire"
Collapse
-
Why is there no 'other' option. There are more options that just the 4 Labour list here.
Leave a comment:
-
I like the way the questionnaire only offers responses that appeal to the brain damaged, sadly no sensible options, and certainly not the option of that which will eventually happen...
Are these MPs really so stupid, alternatively are they like the proverbial rabbit caught in the headlights, or really can't they see it at all?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostI agree with your last para - but no government ever actually does it, despite them all promising to.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIf public sector worker is paid £20k, then extra costs (buildings, power etc) can be additional £10k easily thus increasing cost of public sector worker to £30k.
Add to this extra costs on businesses having to dedicate time dealing with red tape tulip rather than focus on growing businesses: have you ever tried to deal with stuff like EMI share options? It cost us at least 3 days of my time and around £1000 of legal fees so far.
If unemployment benefits are less than this number then it makes sense to cut such jobs. Naturally it only makes sense if the person who does not cut them counts on votes of these people, so we can count NuLie out then.
Solution - simplify legislation BIG time, and this would remove need for lots of public sector staff employed as the result of tulipy legislation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostEH? sack the public sector and then turn them into a massive...er...public sector WTF is the point of that?
Add to this extra costs on businesses having to dedicate time dealing with red tape tulip rather than focus on growing businesses: have you ever tried to deal with stuff like EMI share options? It cost us at least 3 days of my time and around £1000 of legal fees so far.
If unemployment benefits are less than this number then it makes sense to cut such jobs. Naturally it only makes sense if the person who does not cut them counts on votes of these people, so we can count NuLie out then.
Solution - simplify legislation BIG time, and this would remove need for lots of public sector staff employed as the result of tulipy legislation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostWhat about sack every useless public sector worker and remove every public sector quango. Pay the public sector workers job seekers allowance in return for them going round the streets and countrysides of the UK clearing up rubbish.
Leave a comment:
-
What about sack every useless public sector worker and remove every public sector quango. Pay the public sector workers job seekers allowance in return for them going round the streets and countrysides of the UK clearing up rubbish.
Leave a comment:
-
Nu Liebor MP questionnaire
6raise VAT shaply, which hits everyone even pensioners33.33%2increase NI for those earnings over £20,00016.67%1Increase tax for those earning £150,000+16.67%1A one-off tax on bankers bonuses33.33%2Got back home and found (I am a registered voter) spam post from local incumbent Nu Liebor MP with interesting poll asking a number of questions, one of which I am posting now in a poll above.
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Yesterday 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: